Originally posted by monkey_descendant
Oh and I'm sorry for bombarding this thread with anti-male statements, but I'm the only girl in a house full of male chauvanistic pigs. They're
I know precisely what you mean monkey_decendant.
That is precisely why my girlfriends van is going to have the inspection expire at the end of this month. I just got done with some difficult repairs
on my car to save me some moneys. She spends her moneys on QVC, Shopping and the kids. You know what I mean...the fast food lane. No moneys or skills
for auto repairs. She will once again be looking for me to flashdance her through these difficultys so that she can spend more of her moneys on QVC,
Shopping, and her kids and the fast food lane.
I dont want to be a male chauvanistic pig by "rescuing" her from these difficultys and at the same time making myself expendable and disposable for
access to "Sex and beauty..ie..the best years of her life." I would not want to insult her in this manner so I will tell her no when she asks me to
help get her car inspected without any risk on her part. Also I wont let her use my car that I just repaired. I dont want to hurt or insult her ego
needs by flashdancing her through these difficultys.
again monkey decendant
And who ran countries during world war 1 and two? Women took up all the jobs the men no longer did. Yes, maybe men were off fighting but
women weren't allowed to become soldiers. Anyway, teh women out did the men in their own jobs.
So this means that women can run things and do all the work and risk so that I can be a kept man?? Extending my options through her career earnings
and being vocal about my "Victimization??"
This also implys that women cant wait today to become soldiers and live in substantially lower standards/conditions than they currently do to keep
civilization going. Is that correct? Todays women will be glad to give up shopping ,QVC, Home and Garden TV etc etc...the Jewelry Channel...et al. to
live sparce lives overseas and in places far away to keep our civilzation going?? You know what I mean...monkey decendant...lives of deprivation for
civilization..postponed gratification as a career??
YOu know what I mean monkey_decendant....suffer hardship so that I can watch more spike tv,sports, and go fishing...drink more beer???
I am in a manner of speaking with Sir Chancelot...when the going gets difficult get a man to do it for you as a woman. Are all women like this ..no
they are not ..but it is more common than ever polled or spoken about. Most of the women I know will not be taking risks with thier persons or lives
in order to keep and maintain the trappings of the civilization we so take for granted today. They will not even be doing this for other women and
their children nor for a man and his ease.
I asked this question the other day...How many women do you know who marry a man with children ..a ready made family? I am not saying that there are
no women who do this ..but it is usually the other way around. Men marrying women with children. This represents a wide gulf in thinking and social
values. ARe there any polls on this concept??
Being a woman is not a default setting to play through unchallanged/unquestioned and without risk in life. When I see alot of women doing this I call
it sexism. I used to allow alot of women to do this to me till I got smart about alot of things.
Women who can handle these kinds of problems for themselves..great ...Halelujah!! Leaves more time for me to take it easy with my life instead of
flashdacing. I think more women should be doing these kinds of things for themselves. Eventually ...with enough "evolution" happening they can do
this for me...flashdancing...while I go fishing or watch more Spike TV and sports.
For alot of women who cannot think beyond the provincialness of female social values...a maleless world may seem like a nice fantasy....unitl they
have to do a job or task which will involve risk....alot of risk. This is where half or better of the females/women will back pedal.
To be fair about things today...many of the men or what passes for men today will backpedal too. They have been raised primarily by women and have
womens values , thinking, and consumption rates. They think like women and tend to be high maintenance like many women too. Most women I know are not
looking for a career supporting a high maintenance man like this. They dont want the competition. Once again back to that difference in social values
the title to this thread irritates me greatly. it's just over-blown, and completely untrue when you consider the apsolutely vast factors
involved. this is entirely nonsense. so it's not a suprise that such a subject creates such pathetic arguing.
Agree..the vast factors of the difference in socialization/social values I mentioned..ie..risk! Risk covers alot of who will or will not get things
done. Risk is not mentioned alot today. It tends to be discounted while tooting ones horn.
I have seen variations of the title on this thread over and over. It cracks me up once you know about risk.
Maureen Dowd wrote a book with a title like this. I saw it in Costco one day. It busted me out laughing. Only people living in large citys can
afford such ignorance that they take it for granted that the rest of the country will follow thier lead. As if they are leaders for anything or
represent the average American.
Agree with Grady Phillpot about spatial skills...well said Grady.