 |
|
Topic started on 30-1-2008 @ 06:03 PM by zachofalltrades17
|
This is based off of hours of reading articles on atlantis. ( www.world-mysteries.com...) This is actually a cool site. Now i know that
this theory sounds far fetched but well I can explain. First of all there used to be tons of water of water in the sahara. This was during the stage
of Pangea. The Sahara was located on a different latitude, what that means is that the weather was completely different. So the civilization was the
most advanced because it was one of the only ones around. So after a meteor and earthquakes the lands were destroyed and turned into what now is the
harshest weather terrain in the world. This theory still supports the destruction of the city. the Sahara was actually a very aquatic land back then.
The water that they lived off of is still around I.E. the Nile. This is why the egyptians where the only ones who ever recorded the existence of
them. The only way we know they mention it was in: Timaeus and Critias, two of Plato's dialogues, are the only existing written records which
specifically refer to Atlantis.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-3-2008 @ 04:16 AM by La Acadian
|
It is a well known fact that only a few thousand years ago the Sahara was very fertile and wet. Ground penetrating radar shows a great system of
rivers and lakes now dry. It is believed that a shift in the jet stream that caused the Sahara to dry up. This was not that long ago.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-3-2008 @ 04:19 AM by Throbber
|
Huh, someone actually made my theory plausible by adding in the water factor.
My idea was that Atlantis was just swept under tens of thousands of tons of sand and i left it at that.
What this is essentially, is a theoretically plausible version of my rather half-baked idea.
I like.
[edit on 23-3-2008 by Throbber]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 03:39 AM by raptorinvictus
|
Very intresting theory. I agree with it for the most bit.
If what you say is true then it also points to the fact that we were building cities way before we thought we were and it also mkes the theory of
atlantis being technologically advanced more plausable.
This topic deserve more research.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-4-2008 @ 10:14 PM by chupacabraboy
|
not to sound rude but why is stuff about atlantis on alternate personalities
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-4-2008 @ 10:37 PM by hinky
|
I find the Atlantis story to be interesting.
There are numerous reason for the basis of legends and myths. There has to be a basis for the establishment of the story/myth.
I have no problems with Atlantis being located in the middle of what is a desert today. Climate changes happen and this area was an area of water and
plants. Never really considered it in this location, but on first blush, it's as good a place as other claims.
When reviewing the "written" history, one has to take into accounts of an oral legend converted to writing and consider what if any flourishes were
added into the story or even later translations from one language to another. Landmarks can be added to place the location in historical context of
the time the story is told or written.
I have problems when people make the leap of Atlantis dying and then somehow pyramids started appearing and this has to be related. At least that
hasn't been mentioned yet.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-4-2008 @ 11:48 PM by NewWorldOver
|
I believe I heard from Micheal Tsarion that the Sahara has areas with trace radioactivity. He said that could have signified nuclear wars in
pre-history...
The Sahara is so enormous and empty it would be the perfect hiding place for a lost civilization.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:49 AM by fatdad
|
i myself think atlantes is at the bottom of the Mediterranean sea ..i think the sea level outside the straits of Gibraltar was high than the level
inside due to the Mediterranean sea being land locked.. i think an earth quake made a hole where the sea poured in drowning the atlantes land beneath
the sea...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 11:52 AM by hinky
|
Originally posted by fatdad
i myself think atlantes is at the bottom of the Mediterranean sea ..i think the sea level outside the straits of Gibraltar was high than the level
inside due to the Mediterranean sea being land locked.. i think an earth quake made a hole where the sea poured in drowning the atlantes land beneath
the sea... 
The Mediterranean has been landlocked a couple of different times. The layers of salt deposits below the current bottom layer of mud provides the
clues for this. But this has not happened in the time frame given for prehistoric man.
The Black Sea, on the other hand is an interesting candidate. But then, so is the desert location.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2008 @ 07:19 PM by v.i.p.e.r
|
if you look at google earth and zoom in a little to see the outline of the countrys and see the ocean and the under water images u can see where the
earths land use to be and where it is now its kinda odd how everything spred out. makes a beliver out of me
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-4-2008 @ 07:32 PM by fozotronic
|
Read "Fingerprint of the Gods" this has some very interesting theories about the origins of civilisation and includes atlantis. When you take the
bible out of the equation and consider that things have been around for more than 5000 years it opens up a whole new realm of possibilities. take the
blinkers off, your mind will thank you for it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-5-2008 @ 09:40 PM by 6dark6energy6
|
maybe we should get some people together hire lets say 97 diggers and start digging up the desert  mind you tho the world is Huge atlantis
could be any where even under your house (i doubt that tho) i believe it to be in the bermuda triangle AKA 'Devil's Triangle', 'Limbo of the
Lost', 'Hoodoo Sea', 'Port of Missing Ships' and the 'Twilight Zone'.
here is a nice site about the 'Devil's Triangle'
www.crystalinks.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-5-2008 @ 02:44 PM by mantleoftheprophet
|
I've always been interested in Atlantis - the Sahara Desert is a new one or me, I've never heard of that before, however it is an interesting idea
and one that I need to look at. ( www.mantleoftheprophet.co.uk...)
I made some videos about Atlantis and that sort of thing. Some good ideas on this site.
[edit on 25-5-2008 by mantleoftheprophet]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-6-2008 @ 01:27 PM by lalaloo
|
good find ! interesting
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-6-2008 @ 01:36 PM by Nohup
|
Nope. Atlantis, if it was anywhere, was right where Plato said is was, in the Atlantic Ocean, where the Azores Plateau (now islands) is. It was sunk
as a result of tsunamis and earthquake fracturing of the Mid-Atlantic Fault by some kind of meteor or comet strike that also brought about the rapid
end of the last major Ice Age.
www.eurekalert.org...
[edit on 26-6-2008 by Nohup]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-6-2008 @ 02:29 PM by LovelyDoom
|
That's interesting. People forget deserts aren't permanent features.. like lakes and etc, they're created by climate, and can change to forests
quickly under the right conditions.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |