Weak!!!

Both shows were not interesting. I really do hope that they improve so that they wont get cancelled.

Yeah, man. Where's the "startling new smoking gun evidence?" Oh, I see. There ain't any. Digging, talking, more video of little specks of light in the sky. Same unsatisfying thing we always end up with. I guess that means the sun will rise on the same old world again tomorrown morning. These cheap reality shows have failed to turn it upside down.

The best part was the History Channel's UFO Hunters commercial during the Sci Fi's show, priceless!

I liked the Sci Fi one better, but time will tell who the real winner will be.

I think the NJ case is the real deal. I had not seen that video before, but it looked similar to the video those 2 girls shot and put on ATS recently. And the radar data that they recovered is hard to pass off!





[edit on 30-1-2008 by Grey Basket]

I thought the UFO Hunter show on the History Channel was interesting. That is only because I grew up on Vashon Island, which Maury Island is attached. I have spent lots of time at all of the places they showed. Other than that, nothing too exciting.

[edit on 1/31/2008 by evil gnome]

[edit on 1/31/2008 by evil gnome]

I just watched History Channel's UFO Hunters. Man oh man IT WAS A JOKE. Soooo bad! It represented everything everyone has come to associate with UFO stories... cheezy graphics, lame hosts, flashy editing to make it "feel hip", totally circumstantial evidence. The first half of the episode was about Alien debris (literally alien poo-poo) dropping on an unsuspecting ship (a boat) that killed a dog that was onboard some 40 years ago. I couldn't make something like that up! Why is this worthy?!??!?! What a shame, I was looking forward to this series too. I taped Sci-Fi's version and just watched that too. Not much better, but it was a little bit. Brother. Why do these networks churn out the same gimmicky stuff when they SHOULD know that the very audience they're attempting to appeal to will be turned off. I don't think they think much of us when they do this. They should take a cue from TRUE documentaries like OUT OF THE BLUE and CAPTURING THE LIGHT that give credence to this phenomenon. My grade, F, for History Channel's UFO Hunters and a C- for Sci-Fi's.

Sci Fi...1st half hour investigation I was pretty bored with. 2nd half hour investigation much better because of the video and size of the UFO. They need to trim more of the Ghost Hunter feel out of it and come up with their own style otherwise they'll stagnate. Not as scientific as the History channel but the last story was entertaining. Grade B

History...good investigation and good science, but spending one day (if that) with one guy looking for UFO slag, that looks like a rock, underwater is ridiculous. I'm pretty sure they figured that plane was their best shot at finding anything. The show had an interesting start but it grinded to a slow death. Grade C

I taped one and watched the other also.
I thought that the History Channel one was a disaster. First, he started off by saying that they had new evidence on the case, and then switch to the site, where they investigate and basically find nothing. Dishonest, in my opinion.
The Sci-Fi one was somewhat better. The first 30 minutes was not too good, but the Carteret part was interesting, and I liked the fact that they showed the interviews. That was an impressive case.
I do agree with most of you that if something big happens, it'll show up somewhere else first though.
I'd give the Sci-Fi show a B, and the History channel one a D-.