posted on Jan, 31 2008 @ 08:19 PM
I taped one and watched the other also.
I thought that the History Channel one was a disaster. First, he started off by saying that they had new evidence on the case, and then switch to the
site, where they investigate and basically find nothing. Dishonest, in my opinion.
The Sci-Fi one was somewhat better. The first 30 minutes was not too good, but the Carteret part was interesting, and I liked the fact that they
showed the interviews. That was an impressive case.
I do agree with most of you that if something big happens, it'll show up somewhere else first though.
I'd give the Sci-Fi show a B, and the History channel one a D-.