The Top Secret US Military Space Program. Is The Future Already Here?

page: 16
104
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 04:07 PM
link   
I had the opportunity to speak with a former NASA scientist a few weeks ago. During the course of our talk I asked him why they expected us to believe that with all the advances in technology over the last 100yrs, why they expected us to believe it was still necessary to place explosives under our butts to obtain orbit when it is obvious to even casual observers (maybe I am too generous here) that there are other technologies available that don't use nearly as much energy, don't explode, aren't as visible, and are more easily controlled, etc..

I told him I believe that the NASA public projects are an illusion to keep us busy and not believing that our capabilities are far more advanced. He as much agreed without saying so. I was shocked...

And no I won't put his life in danger by revealing who he is to anyone for any reason or price.. He deserves his anonymity and privacy.




posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 04:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Netzarim
 


Yep, it just doesn't make any sense why all things got way more advanced, but the most important thing for spacetravel the rocket still needs fossil fuel. Sounds unbelievable.



posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by COOL HAND
For God's sake, another one of these topics? Are you kidding me?

Let's ask the same simple questions that have been asked in all the OTHER FORUMS here about the same subject and see if you can shed any more light on them.

1. Where do these ships launch from?
2. Where are the eyewitness accounts of these launches? Where are the reports from other countries of launches that weren't predisclosed?
3. Where are they recruiting these secret astronauts from?
4. Where are the pictures of these secret stations in orbit? Why aren't other countries asking about unkown objects in orbit?
5. Why haven't any other countries attempted to put their own secret stations up there to monitor ours?

Start with those, if you can answer them we can hit you with the others that no one else here can answer.

Deny Ignorance, don't embrace it.

[edit on 28/1/08 by COOL HAND]


"Where can I sign up?"



posted on Nov, 2 2009 @ 02:39 AM
link   
Hey Mike!!

I'm just posting this picture here since you commented on it in our other thread:


The Censored 'Comet' over Tsiolkovsky - Apollo 12





Amazing pic, Ex! :coolthumb: That looks like a man made rocket having a conventional propulsion system! There's a thread of mine....
... The Top Secret Military Space Program, where it is alleged that craft like the Nautilus and TAW-50 regularly make secret trips to the Moon and back!



posted on Mar, 9 2011 @ 10:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi

Originally posted by Royal76
The military will always do things to safe guard us


Will the power hungry high ranking officials who are puppets of the presidential administration and wealthy special interest groups and banks always do things to safe guard us? Or will the brave men and women who joined to defend what this country stands for do things to safe guard us?

You are thinking of the every day men and women that have sworn to defend this country and it's people from all enemies when you say "the military". Unfortunately it's not those men and women involved in these multi-billion dollar secret programs. It's the power hungry high ranking officials who are puppets of the presidential administration and wealthy special interest groups and banks.


You aren't thinking ahead enough. Ever heard of the possibility of getting invaded by an advanced alien species? I'm in full support of these secret space defense programs, we never know when we'll need it, and it's better to be prepared then not.



posted on May, 1 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
Utah



posted on Sep, 8 2011 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Good thread well worth a bump




posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 03:09 PM
link   
Any Tesla ships involved, I sure would like to see some of those.
I mean how secret are we talking about here.
In those cases the future has been here for a long time.



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 03:52 AM
link   
reply to post by mikesingh
 


That makes a lot of sense to me. "UFOs" are pieces of military equipment. I think there is little question that President Eisenhower set up NASA to hide a "parallel weapons program" as you put it.



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 06:09 AM
link   
It should be a well known fact that mankind simply cannot afford the massive amounts of currency it would take to actually get space exploration underway. Technology developes so rapidly , that it would be a waste of money to build something like star trek. Simply because we would need a trillion or so dollars ...and it would be out dated by the time of completion.

Could we colonize planets right now? Yes. Could we build a star trek like ship right now? Yes.

Obviously. However , it just isn't worth it right now to do so.

Literally it isn't worth it. Yet.



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 06:11 AM
link   
reply to post by FullySemiNude
 



That makes a lot of sense to me. "UFOs" are pieces of military equipment. I think there is little question that President Eisenhower set up NASA to hide a "parallel weapons program" as you put it.


Wrong. The military space program was already sailing along at full speed under the direction of the Army; Eisenhower was Army and considered rockets to be artillery. NASA was founded explicitly to develop peaceful space applications that could be shared with the world. Von Braun's military team was capable of lofting America's first satellite months before Sputnik, but Eisenhower insisted that it be done by the civilian agency. During the Cold War, small symbols like this could loom large.



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 07:36 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


My point was Eisenhower intentionally wanted to create the impression space=peace when the opposite was, is, and forever shall be the truth. Space is about weapons, weapons, weapons systems, and nothing else. Anything else that is done, peaceful wise, is done to cover for this fact about military activity. So what there is Hubble? That is nothing more than a reconnaissance satellite pointed outward. We would never have gone into space nor would we be in space now were it not for the military objectives. This is one way in which we can be sure Apollo was not real. Real Apollo would have been too big an investment for a cover. Since it is a cover, it must be fake.



posted on Jul, 26 2012 @ 05:27 AM
link   
reply to post by FullySemiNude
 



My point was Eisenhower intentionally wanted to create the impression space=peace when the opposite was, is, and forever shall be the truth. Space is about weapons, weapons, weapons systems, and nothing else. Anything else that is done, peaceful wise, is done to cover for this fact about military activity. So what there is Hubble? That is nothing more than a reconnaissance satellite pointed outward. We would never have gone into space nor would we be in space now were it not for the military objectives. This is one way in which we can be sure Apollo was not real. Real Apollo would have been too big an investment for a cover. Since it is a cover, it must be fake.


By this reasoning, the Peace Corps does not exist.



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 12:54 PM
link   
how long will people keep ignoring the fact there is a seceret space fleet we are denied to know about!?

USSS Curtis Lemay and USSS Roscoe Hillencotter

edit on 24-5-2013 by tachyonator7 because: typo





new topics
top topics
 
104
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join