The Top Secret US Military Space Program. Is The Future Already Here?, page 15
Pages: <<  12    13    14    15    16  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 102 times


reply posted on 17-4-2008 @ 11:02 AM by jaamaan
This is more what i ment.


Reason as the source of the most reliable knowledge.

I should explain a bit here about how knowledge obtained by reason and argument alone has been seen as more reliable than knowledge from the senses. It was not easy to settle whether the earth is round or flat- this is often debated today, even if few people decide it is flat. There have been other questions, such as what are the elementary substances of which the earth is made, and what the sun and moon are made of and how far away they are. It has taken centuries of science to answer these questions. In ancient and mediaeval times there were no definite answers.

By contrast, ancient mathematicians had shown, from a few axioms and using a limited number of rules of inference, that the sum of the 3 angles of a triangle was 2 right angles. This was proved without examining any real triangles; yet on examining real triangles the result is confirmed, in every case. This appeared to show that the most reliable knowledge is obtained by reason, and that it is knowledge about the external world.

-

Reason and argument were originally seen as the prime source of reliable knowledge. Plato referred to this as dialectic. In the 18th century Immanuel Kant, having been very impressed with how Isaac Newton described the real world by his theory of gravitation, wrote about how synthetic a priori propositions are possible. A priori means before examining any data; and synthetic means saying more than is merely implied by or contained in the starting premises. Kant viewed Newton's theory as giving definite knowledge about the external world, in the same way as geometry had been thought to do from ancient times.

-

As dialectic is said to be an older method than Russell's logistic or analytic method, I will say a bit about it. Plato often refers to dialectic as his own method and as the highest form of knowledge. For Plato dialectic is the method of asking a question, giving an answer, and asking further questions until the matter is solved. Aristotle appears to have had the same meaning for dialectic.
www.ul.ie...



reply posted on 17-6-2008 @ 10:51 AM by rocksarerocks
reply to post by Anonymous ATS




Yup! There's also an atmosphere on the moon, humans under Denver International Airport, a secret base at Dulce, an underground transit system, and all of the above have been documented and proven along with your claims above. Great job spreading the rumors!


reply posted on 28-6-2008 @ 01:18 PM by PhilltFred
Originally posted by ZeroGhost

How many TRILLION DOLLARS was missing from the U.S. coffers in the last few years? Did not the GAO cite this massive loss with only confused questions?

They are rolling in money, and it IS ours. They just found it, did not tell us in the name of National Security, and are doing what they want with it. BTW, they lost it in the first place and found it in the dark budgets no accounting can ever find.

ZG

And what about drug money laundered into black projects? It doesn't take a genius to figure out that while the Taliban was controlling Afghanistan they destroyed the poppy fields and heroin and opium dropped to zero from there. Since we have sent troops to "liberate" the Afghanis, production has peaked once again.

It would be nice to think that our tax dollars alone pay for all of these covert projects, but reality is that they can't and don't. Even with the deficit spending to maintain all of the federal handout programs, our tax dollars alone cannot afford them.

The Drug War was created so that the money would be funneled into these black programs instead of into the hands of drug dealers. William Cooper claimed that this money helped finance the covert space program which has been flying shuttles out of Vandenberg for years before there was a NASA public shuttle program.

I'd like to address a previous comment regarding health and cures also. It is not necessarily the government that suppresses cancer cures, but the collusion of the AMA and FDA, wit the financial blessings of the pharmaceutical industry.

And regarding energy technology, while it would be great to unlock the source of such free and abundant energy, it is like opening Pandora's Box in that while it can provide benevolent use to replace oil, gas, and nuclear, it can also be used by our enemies and fanatics in general to create very powerful weapons as well. Perhaps it is the stance of the "powers that be" that we are not yet ready to handle such abundance of free power, else as many conspiracy theorists claim, it is the power of Big Oil and the financiers that suppress it for their own greedy agendas. Either way, we lose.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:59 PM by ANNED
If there is a secret space station i know where it is and why no one can see it.

Its at the earth/moon L2 point.
You can not see it because it is always behind the moon.
This would be the perfect place to hid it.

The program my be a military starwars program.
But not the one you are thinking of.

I believe the US and a few friendly countries have been setting up a weapons storage site for there weapons of last resort.
These weapons would be used instead of nuclear weapons if the US is attack with nuclear weapons.

Scenario One attack by Iran or North korea
In this scenario the country firing a nuke at the US would be given a warning after our interceptors take out the weapon.
The Original Starwars.

They would be told that if they did not Surrender within 2 days they would face massive retaliation.

The first thing they will watch is the US nuclear sites to see if we were getting ready to launch.

they would not be watching space.

Scenario Two russia or china
same as Scenario one execpt we would take out there government with a massive NON nuclear attack.
At the same time they would be told that if they did not Surrender within 2 days they would face massive retaliation.

The first thing they will watch is the US nuclear sites to see if we were getting ready to launch.

They would not be watching space.

Scenario three
We would call for a cease fire and ask for there Surrender terms setting up a meeting in 3 days.

The first thing they will watch is the US nuclear sites to see if we were getting ready to launch.

They would not be watching space.

In all three Scenarios they would never know what hit them.
it would be a bolt from the blue.

Our weapons
Not nukes.
Just big rocks

Just look what a 150-foot meteor did near Winslow, Ariz
www.thewordteaches.com...
wikimapia.org...

Even a 20 foot rock would be dangerous


Now for there launch sites.
They use a system like used on space ship one execpt much larger.
about the size of a C5 cargo plane.
This would allow them to launch over the ocean out of site of people.

Is this a guess.
not really.

I heard this from a rocket scientist at NWC China Lake in the late 1970s after he had done a paper on it for the government.
He was transferred 6 months later to a NASA/Air Force lab.



reply posted on 5-12-2008 @ 08:22 AM by mikesingh
reply to post by ANNED



Interesting points! And to think that the then pres Ronald Reagan wanted to establish a forward post on the Moon, not against a supposed alien threat that many imagined, but actually as part of the Star Wars program, that include the options you have mentioned.

But then again some say that the SW program has something to do with a probable future alien threat too! Killing two birds with one stone?

Cheers!


reply posted on 5-12-2008 @ 09:48 AM by StellarX
reply to post by ANNED



Now type of four of five scenarios presuming that the Russian/Chinese are the one's with the orbital 'battle stations' and weapons on the Moon. It's strange that it's always presumed that the US landing on the moon first 'proves' that moon related activities would necessarily then always have to do with the US. Does anyone here realise that beside for the moon landing 'first' ( edit : Firsts in space that is and not in my opinion always because the US lacked the capabilities) the USSR did practically everything else first; including everything noteworthy?

Stellar



[edit on 5-12-2008 by StellarX]
Pages: <<  12    13    14    15    16  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 17 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 93 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 69 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies