It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


John McCain: "There's going to be other wars, I am sorry to tell you"

page: 4
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in


posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 10:55 AM

90+ years to go...

[edit on 28-1-2008 by EBE154]

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:09 AM

Originally posted by ajapocalypse
the thing that makes me wonder i how he repeats "there will be another war" three times. i once read somewhere about how this triple repetition was some sort of masonic/illuminist code. i think it was around the time of the Micheal Richards fiasco. i don't know what that's worth, but it just seemed rather strange to me.

maybe he's just trying to beat it into our brains.

Yes, it's an illuminati code. It's like Ariel Sharon saying "Vee vill vin! Vee vill vin! Vee vill vin!" at a press conference.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:14 AM
reply to post by EBE154

I think we are going to have a presence in the middle east and Iraq is going to be it no matter who is President. Any politician saying we are going to pull everyone out of Iraq is the one I would assume is lieing.

We spent over a half billion dollars on an enclave to protect our soldiers and diplomats there it is the most expensive structure of its kind.

So I don't see us leaving anytime soon.

- Con

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:17 AM

Originally posted by ergoli

Yes, it's an illuminati code. It's like Ariel Sharon saying "Vee vill vin! Vee vill vin! Vee vill vin!" at a press conference.

Really?? is that so? you know this? whats there secret handshake? I didn't see McCains decoder ring?

More sensationalism please!

- Con

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:28 AM
True American-

I'm sorry to tell you there will be other wars. He was telling the truth. The United States is an infant compaired to the History of the World. How many wars; major and minor have we already been in? It is also in our DNA to try and police the rest of the world. We will always be some kind of scrape or another. The HOPE is that we will never be in another one like WWI or II, because what we did to each other in those wars could destroy the planet if we did a III. McCain is just being realistic.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:47 AM
McCain is a Bush clone. Total special interest serving war-monger. He epitomzes the worst of our gov. Pure scum.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:53 AM
I think the poor guy went nuts as a POW. Not somebody you want to hand over the nuclear arsenal to.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:56 AM
That is pretty disgusting, he's talking about how he can take the soldiers to medical professions "faster"... rather then question why are we there in a first place, why our kids need to die for some politicians. It's always the "elders" that choose to dispose a life of "young" one!

This world becoming a very sad world, I hope the people WAKE UP and see the true colors of war! The ONLY True candidate out there with a mission of "PEACE" is RON PAUL! This is the only time in my life I wish I was an American, so that I can vote for RP, and slowly change the world into what it was meant to be, the exploration of our souls and not destroying it!

"If we fail to nourish our souls, they wither, and without the souls life ceases to have meaning"!

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 11:59 AM

Originally posted by rikriley
reply to post by TrueAmerican

Would it not be nice if a candidate would say when I am elected my goal is to have world peace. Now I relize we live in the real world but would'nt it be wonderful to here that out of a politicians mouth. Rik Riley

That would be Dr. Ron Paul.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 12:02 PM
I have heard rumors that the real reason the Vietnam war ended wasn't because we were over-run far from it the real reason is our soldiers simply said thats enough and stopped fighting a ignorant grinder war only designed to really depopulate both sides. They sat in their trenches and got stoned - so what can the command do when they have no command - so the war ends and they evacuate ahead of the oncoming Viet Cong - Now we have holiday inns and trade with Vietnam - so what did we really accomplish..

Now we have a fresh patch of rhetoric spouters who are not going to change anything - but make sure that America continues on its path of self-destruction. And when the US banks fail which they eventually will the FDIC will just turn around and bail out the deposits and banks they feel like bailing out while not bailing out the others - and whatever the cost is they will simply add to the deficit - its the same thing they did with the FSLIC loans in the Savings and Loans collapse of 87 to the tune of 200+ billion. And Wall Street and the Banks are all trying to delay the inevitable lawsuits from peddling junk bond ARM mortgages like they are AAA+ loans... So how are they going to get out of that one - if they do not pay - central banks like China will *punish* America by dumping their currency holdings and crash the dollar - if they *DO* pay back the face value of the Junk Bonds then the US government AKA the FDIC and other insurers will have to take the tab - which means it just gets passed onto you the taxpayer... In a nutshell in both cases the same result ensues - your dollar becomes that much more worthless.

So in the next 5 years taxpayers will be paying horredous taxes with next to no services - a semi-functioning and anemic government - bank closures - stock market swings reflecting the massive uncertainty and so on - So in a nutshell the banksters and gangsters that manipulate and have control of wall street will make ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that you are the ones who pay for it when Milk is $8 / gallon, and jobs are scarce (unless you want to work for the police state etc)...

Its not a message of doom - its just a message of reality until we all wake up and get heavily involved in fighting exposing and stopping all forms of corruption *AND* abuse against the Joe Taxpayer...

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 12:27 PM
It's sad to see the way we've gotten locked into a war can't be avoided way of thinking. I'm all for being realistic, but clearly he is just playing to the hawks in his party. Sad.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 12:44 PM
WOW I only need to watch this video for 10 seconds to see that John McCain is another self deluded nut and anyone who votes for this moron is even nuttier than him. Is it any god damn wonder that we are constantly fighting wars when you allow warmongers like him into positions of authority or power. The only place John McCain is fit for, is the nearest mental asylum.
Take him away please!!!!!!!!

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 12:49 PM
reply to post by kindred

I happen to agree. Another thing that's funny is that it appears there are several members here who have not even bothered to watch the video, and instead are arguing over the article.
Watch the friggin video, will ya?

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 12:55 PM
What really worries me is that McCain may well be TPTB's top "pre-approved" acceptor of the special interest torch. He is the military industrial complex's and mass corporation's wet-dream come true. And he keeps popping up as winning in many of these vote counts (which are corrupt 97% of the time). And the corporate sponsored media is of course singing his praises and giving him maximum exposure. Business as usual, programming all the sheep.


posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 01:09 PM
If people are choosing a candidate for Presidency, on who will be the least likely to draw us into another war - you really need to rethink your position.

At this stage of the game, the only thing that is going to change are the names of the people in power and the Country we go up against.

Bush let the cat out of the bag, when he told the world, the war on "terror" would last approximately twenty seven years. We are about in year six or seven of this war. Being a Republican or a Democrat will not change this path. Do you understand?

At first, I refused to vote this time. I don't believe the next President can make a drastic change and that they are all blowing hot air, just to have the prestige of "President" attached to their name. Whoever wins this Presidency inherits a mess, and people really need to start thinking of the word "experience" over the false illusion of change.

If things were good in the world, I really think Obama could be a great President, but dilusion is far from me. If he wins the ticket over Hillary, I'll flip my vote, for the first time in my life and vote with the Republicans.

[edit on 28-1-2008 by Myrtales Instinct]

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 01:10 PM
reply to post by DimensionalDetective

Money went to the Bush campaign and McCain took a back seat.

Also JFK JR was out of the way but can't say if a run for the
Presidency was in the offing. Charisma along might have given JR
a landslide victory.

Obama charisma may be at a peak now.
Let see the game plan to diminish it.

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 01:28 PM
So his strategy is to frighten people into voting for him?

And Of course, There are always wars, but...

Its obvious hes referring to a other Wars that will take place during the span of his Potential Presidency. Hence, "Frighten people into voting for him." since hes all about security

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 01:36 PM
reply to post by ChronMan

Fear sells.

Just look at what the Dubya admin has been able to accomplish with fear-mongering. They have had the sheeples eating out of their palms and gotten away with absolute murder over and over again.

You still hear people spouting, "So and so will keep us safe from the terrorists!"

But at least some people appear to be waking up to this conditioning / brainwashing. I hope it won't be too late, where we find ourselves repeating the same nonsense for the next several years...

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 01:43 PM
reply to post by DimensionalDetective

Isn't that what past Presidents have said before about protecting America? You think this started with "Dubya" administration?

posted on Jan, 28 2008 @ 03:11 PM
reply to post by TrueAmerican

Well John.

I am sorry to tell you that there won't be other wars. Not unless you decide to send your own families to war. I am all for politicians suicide bombing, that would be fine with me.

However, if you plan on sending our soldiers to more wars where they will kill (by accident or otherwise) thousands more civilians.

We are not having it.

[edit on 1/28/2008 by biggie smalls]

top topics

<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in