Never ever believe what your told- no matter who its from- thats what I've learned...
When the gov't tried to cover-up Flight 93 crashing but presented little evidence of plane wreckage and materials- I was not surprised....a paper had
even wrote ("Looked as if a bunch of metal scraps had been thrown on the scene")
Nor was I surprised when I saw pictures of the pentagon hit by what looked more like an explosive or missile rather than a plane because like I said-
there were no parts...as well as the small amount of devastation compared to if a plane truly did hit it. (A slim fragment of the building was
destroyed compared to what really would have occurred had a plane slammed into it).
- I ask you...If a large 747 Boeing jet hits the ground or a building, would it not create a HUGE crater full of wreckage???? THINK ABOUT IT...its not
like a missile where you hit one spot and the rest is fine...there should be sign of damage on the lowest to highest infrastructure, area near it,
flames would be everywhere, etc...
Now we move onto the twin towers...Besides many people hearing "explosions", there have been videos slowed down, image zoomed in, etc. that have
shown a clear detonation (windows popping out before plane even hit the building). Now I dont know if it was Giuliani or Bush that made that call to
"pull" those towers but clearly those detonations would have been made from BOMBS PLANTED PREVIOUSLY before ANY attack had taken place. The heat
that melted the steel of the building was far too hot for any jet fuel or flame attached to it. The impact itself no doubt happened but I believe it
was pre-meditated as much as it could have been. I have heard that there is speculation as to it could have been mini-nukes (which they may or may
not have used in the Oklahoma city bombing) and or large amounts of c-4. Im not an explosives expert but there have been countless experts that agree
with my statement- the collapse was clearly due to a pre-meditated large explosive and the steel melted far too hot for a plane explosion.
- "9-11 was in inside job" I believe the website stated something about an ex-FBI agent going to lunch with 2 superiors in march of 2001 who
discussed the FBI staging some sort of "terrorist" act somewhere in a major city. The anthrax that was unleashed also thereafter would belong to the
"staged" category as well....My mother worked in one of the tabloid buildings that the anthrax exposure was and one of her co-workers had died from
exposure to it.
I don't know how people can believe such nonsense that the government is innocent....Don't you think with all the technology and abuse of privacy we
have, we would have been able to stop a few planes from crashing into the most important buildings in our country? The CIA, FBI, and every other
organization has specific agencies within them that work 24/7 365 days a year to prevent terrorism, did they take the day off? How can you just
believe that the government "slipped" on that one day? Those attacks lead us into an unjustified, wreckless, endangering war that we have gone into
completely blind. Everyday you go to your homepage I'm sure you see "5 marines killed in roadside bombing" or "30 killed in suicide blast"-
everyone of those innocent people and soldiers that have died needlessly deserve the truth. The government is no longer the government- its become a
secret dictatorship hidden beneath secret laws being passed for their grand plan- meanwhile our pockets are bleeding dry, gas is at an all time high,
and bush walks around the world with a smile on his face...It's these kind of attacks that scare people into giving their rights away to be "safe"
which is just what they want. We don't need protection from terrorists, we need protection from our own government. The scary thing is- if they
planned and executed this kind of attack once- they will most certainly do it again.
Our forefathers wouldn't be disappointed- they would be disgusted.
You don't have to believe or agree- I'm just asking you to rethink what you've heard, question it, then come about your own conclusions....not just
what you've heard or read...Is it not possible to pay off "scientists" or "experts" to present false information to the public? I am not one for
conspiracy's but 9-11 has too many unanswered questions...unfortunately many people who lost their lives that day will never get the chance to fight-
so I choose to fight for them.
[edit on 28-1-2008 by dj05544]