It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by OrionStars
EXACTLY the answer I expected. You have not once offered anything in regards to evidence to support any of your theories.
Typical
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Originally posted by OrionStars
Perhaps, people should stop being overwhelming vague and start dealing with specific details instead, particularly pertinent science details.
Troll bait!
It was only vague because you cannot put the post in context--it is a comprehension issue for you--unfortunately, that seems to be your modus operandi.
Look at my latest post and independent investigation video for 'specific details"
And is there a reason you do not use the word "scientific?"
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by OrionStars
Orion,
I should not even consider answering you. You continue to dodge every question presented to you. (no only by me)
You know EXACTLY what I'm talking about. If not...lets look at one of the more popular "truther" sites. "Scholars For 911 Truth". Do you know one of those "scholars" is a dermatologist?
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
May I respectfully ask what your background is in building construction and science? Thanks.
If you did not recognize it when you saw it, no explanation is going help at this point in time.
Originally posted by FredT
Ahem
Kindly stop the personal sniping and lets gt back to the topic at hand. Please!
Thanks
FredT, Moderator
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
What abundance of evidence?
A lack of evidence is not in and of itself, evidence.
It would be refreshing if you would keep that in mind, every time you promote the "official" reports as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Which they definitely are not. You have yet to scientifically prove anything yourself. You merely keep falling back on hearsay from the White House "official" reports.
All you redundantly keep telling us is you question(ed) nothing. You simply accepted what you were told by hearsay at face value and hold firm. You continue to project nothing but blind loyalty for the White House "official" reports. Then you have the pomposity to personally attack others unwilling to become blind loyalists exactly like yourself.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
What abundance of evidence?
A lack of evidence is not in and of itself, evidence.
It would be refreshing if you would keep that in mind, every time you promote the "official" reports as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Which they definitely are not.
You have yet to scientifically prove anything yourself.
You merely keep falling back on hearsay from the White House "official" reports.
All you redundantly keep telling us is you question(ed) nothing. You simply accepted what you were told by hearsay at face value and hold firm.
You continue to project nothing but blind loyalty for the White House "official" reports.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by OrionStars
EXACTLY the answer I expected. You have not once offered anything in regards to evidence to support any of your theories.
Typical
Originally posted by jfj123
1. Please be specific as to what posts I have made in which I have not also provided supportive evidence?
2. Also please be specific about who I have personally attacked and what I said.
If you can't be specific, then I can safely assume you are lying about my posts to make me look bad (ironically that would be a personal attack) and make yourself feel better.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
1. Please be specific as to what posts I have made in which I have not also provided supportive evidence?
2. Also please be specific about who I have personally attacked and what I said.
If you can't be specific, then I can safely assume you are lying about my posts to make me look bad (ironically that would be a personal attack) and make yourself feel better.
The moderators would edit out all the citations I would have to make in order to validate. All people have to do is read what you write, and no validation from me is necessary. All you do is rely on "official" reports citations, red herring and ad hominem. The proof is self-evident in your posts. You are not going to see it that way, but you are not on the receiving end of your own posts. We recipients are left with interpreting what you meant and intended not you.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by OrionStars
LoL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What exactly is the RIGHT way to ask you to back up your statements there friend? One gentleman actually put "I respectfully ask you".
So what does it take? A steak, a BJ, or just kowtowing and pretending we actually believe you?
1f.) Relevant Content: You will not post messages that are clearly outside of the stated topic of any forums nor disrupt a forum by deliberately posting repeated irrelevant messages or copies of identical messages (also known as "flooding").
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by OrionStars
LoL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What exactly is the RIGHT way to ask you to back up your statements there friend? One gentleman actually put "I respectfully ask you".
So what does it take? A steak, a BJ, or just kowtowing and pretending we actually believe you?
Originally posted by ItsHumanNature
Hi fellow Truthers and also hello to you OfficialConspiracyTheoryBelievers. Th Discovery channel show MythBusters has issued an invitation to submit "myths" for them to explore. There are obviously enough myths pertaining to the events of Black Tuesday to provide enough material for a whole season. I suggest that everyone interested in this topic to submit one or two well defined myths from that day to them for testing. Truthers- heres your chance to prove whether concrete turns into dust in a building collapse etc- and OTC Believers quit griping about the impossibilities of daylight Holographic projections etc. and submit it to the crew at Mythbusters.
Here is the thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Please be civil and happy MythBusting