It took THIRTY PAGES of nit-picking, and the only SIMPLE "provided evidence" (asked for in the OpeningPost!) is ignored by all participants.
Evidence which is crystal clear laid out, and never refuted.
It's now 10 days since I posted this on top of page 19 of this thread :
and not one of those, who vehemently attack OR defend parts or the total of the official position on 9/11 of the US government and its Institutions,
have posted questions or tried to prove me wrong on my thesis that human intervention is crystal clear, from the huge amount of external energy
introduced before the first visible signs of collapse of the last WTC tower demolished on 9/11, the WTC 7 building.
NOT ONE follow-up post regarding my irrefutable evidence that 9/11 was planned in advance, and executed in military style.
Which military, or a combination of them, is still an important question.
You don't need to be an academic to be able to understand what I proved in my thesis, in fact any basic school boy or girl will be able to understand
That's also the reason why no one can refute the facts I laid in front of you all.
Because those facts are so damn SIMPLE, no academic language is needed to understand those facts, or need to be used to refute them.
So why, oh why, are all of these official-theory believers, posting here, so blatantly absent now in my seismic-proof threads?
Because none of them can find and come up with a valid oppositional argument?
That seems to be the only possible conclusion.
And if you can't disprove my arguments, you have to accept the fact that FAR TOO MUCH external energy was introduced before the first visible sign
that WTC 7 began collapsing.
And subsequently accept that the same amount of external energy was introduced before any visible signs of the global collapses of WTC 1 and 2.
The impact of an airplane is a massive chaotic, unpredictable event.
The three external energy introductions, before all three 9/11 collapses, were certainly far less chaotic, and very well planned.
Thus having MUCH MORE structural demolition IMPACT than the MEDIA spectacle which the two plane impacts and their unpredictable, following chaotic
damage pattern, in reality were.
And thus those external energy introductions broke the back of already damaged buildings.
And were enough to start an inevitable gravitational collapse, started by these explosions.
If you could diagonally cut all WTC 1 and 2 core columns below plane impact level (best would be 3 meters above the first mechanical floor below
impact), so they slip down two to three meters all together, at once, their total mass will pull on their hat truss connections, which force then will
spread out via the hat truss construction and then push down equally on all four of the outer walls, and the collapse initiating point will then be at
plane impact damage level, as Griff concluded so eloquently before.
Or at core column cut-level, when there is no plane impact damage, as in the WTC 7 collapse.
And when you want to be sure that a global collapse will proceed to ground level, you place a few more charges at the lower core columns, and
especially heavy ones at the mechanical floor levels and basements.
If you are honest to yourself, and can't refute my conclusions, than you have to start doubting the NIST report conclusions, which report basically
is a massive fact gathering, done by honest researchers, and than subsequently the whole heap of facts were interpreted by politically driven
NIST-editors, who stick their opinions to the culminated facts, and then declare these opinions into factual conclusions.
If WTC 7 clearly was a demolition, then all conclusions by NIST, LDEO, 9/11Commission, FEMA report, Purdue, are all not worth the paper written on.
Prove me wrong, OR start seriously doubting the 9/11 explanations by the US government and its institutions.
This is an extraordinary claim, which however doesn't require extraordinary proof.
That proof is in fact extraordinary simple, and in my case, handed over by two, academically highly valued, US institutions.