It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Same here.
But does it give you a right to do it to me?
Like I said bad on BOTH supposed sides.
Oh and photocopies (otherwords scans of original documents) please.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And you gang up on those that disagree with you.
Vicious little cycle that gets us NO WHERE.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
I am trying to bring an understanding here man.
Both sides get attacked by the other.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
All the evidence I have had chucked at me in condescention when I dare to disagree all I can see is possible interptetations.
NOT incontrivertable truths.
It COULD mean this. But it COULD also mean this.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by Valhall
Val,
Please explain how I am lying.
Thank you
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
You just don't get what I am trying to say do you?
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by Midav
Popular Mechanics has a great article on debunking the 9-11 myth.
However, there will always be those that will want to believe otherwise...
[edit on 28-1-2008 by Midav]
Are you not aware Thomas Eagar's "Popular Mechanics" article became the Bush adminstration's original "official" report? That is the what is causing all the dissention, between those not agreeing with the original Bush administration presentation vs. the plural you agreeing with it. So much for your concept of debunking.
Debunking would come after the "official" White House report, not before it came out.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by Midav
Well, I don't know about you, but my view of 9/11 has evolved with every conversation I had, and I've had some.
But alas you have point there, most people have locked their opinions about how things went and are not willing to change their grounds even when it becomes unstable.
Originally posted by Valhall
Simply put - which is more important Mr. Truther? Finding the truth (which lies within the facts we can gather) or making damned sure your theory wins?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Valhall
Simply put - which is more important Mr. Truther? Finding the truth (which lies within the facts we can gather) or making damned sure your theory wins?
How abot Mr. Official Story Believer, how can they believe in something without evidence and state they know what happened that day?
Then on top of that state they do not need to post evidence.
In regard to the NIST report, I have looked into many of the claims made by engineers here and at other sites. I have taken these claims and asked others [professionals] if they hold water. So far not one person has proven the NIST report wrong. There have been MANY independant papers written that support the findings with NIST.
Again, NIST and their findings are supported by 99.999% of the professional community.