It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Midav
This is my belief forced on no one: Some people will always believe what they want to, regardless of how much evidence is put forward.
Originally posted by Cuhail
What kind of gain are you looking for? Everybody to align with your view only? This is a place where different theories are looked at and possibly combined to finish a puzzle to which we don't know what the picture is.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
but it stands to logic (to me) that the internal collapse would be happening far faster inside then what you could gauge from the outside collapse. Sorta like the center collapsing out type situation.
Otherwords just watch the videos with an open mind for any possiblity.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Please pay close attention to the condition of that steel, and then say again any alleged 767 going inside was able to push steel to the outside instead. Please note how clean cut and vertical so many of the vertical steel tubes remain. Then we have the areas which were not completely cut. Also, please note the absence of anything resembling 767 engines.
Originally posted by OrionStars
If NIST considers the steel facade and perimeter primary load bearing tubes, attached to the outside "failing", while the inside of the buildings were almost completely molecularly disintigrating, and exploding the double exterior steel walls outward at the same time, then NIST has a strange concept of the word "failure of structural steel". They must make up their own definitions of industry terms as it whimsically suits them to do so.
Originally posted by bovarcher
reply to post by SlightlyAbovePar
'Truth-ism' is a religion, secure in the shared belief-system that 'it-was-an-inside-job.' There is no point engaging with someone whose position is so fixed that they are not looking for answers, and refuse to answer questions, because their mind is made up. 'If you don't BELIEVE IT, then you must be stupid!!!'
Originally posted by thesneakiod
reply to post by Jeff Riff
Ive no idea what you really want here, you want proof, proof of what? Scientific reports of why the towers fell, which has been done. Is that proof? Or just do you just accept what you want to believe?
The proof that planes hit the towers? Multiple witnesses, caught live on TV, is that proof for you?
The fact that there are Muslim extremists out there who despise the west and have made no bones about destroying us, is that proof?
Anyway, whats your proof?
Prove to me and everyone here that terrorist's didn't board those planes and fly them into the towers. Prove that a plane never hit the pentagon, prove that a plane never crashed in shanksville after the cockpit was bombarded by the passengers.
I personally don't know either way, but the "stout believers" get a hard time just because they accepted the facts that are in front of them. Whilst the CTs seem to get away with murder in my opinion. CTs only have theories that are tenuous at best, truthers are lambasted for accepting the official story. No one wins really.