It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by heelstone
The onus of proof lies on the poeple making the claims that Saddam did in fact have WMD. Which was our republican executive administration that sanctioned this military action.
Those of us that believe otherwise are validated by the simple fact that the reasons for the invasion have not panned out in the least. Theres our evidence right there.
Being wrong does not mean telling a lie.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
I tire of this. All I am looking for is the proof of the claims you and others like you make.
Give me a break. The left wants people to think Bush is an evil death dealer with no consideration for anything and lies his ass off all the time.
The right thinks he's a fantastic cowboy who sticks to his guns and does what's right in the face of opposition.
I think both are bull# and mainly based on conjecture. Thanks for not proving anything yet again.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Originally posted by heelstone
The onus of proof lies on the poeple making the claims that Saddam did in fact have WMD. Which was our republican executive administration that sanctioned this military action.
Those of us that believe otherwise are validated by the simple fact that the reasons for the invasion have not panned out in the least. Theres our evidence right there.
I totally agree that there are no WMD, as of yet, in Iraq, and I am becoming wary that we will not find them.
The proof I ask for, is what makes it proven that "lies" occured. Is it not possible that out of all the Intellegence, which you and I are not privy to, the most reasonable conclusion would be in favor of Iraq having them pre-war? Of course it is.
WMD is not the only reason for the war, but rather a selling point, which of course is used for any war or military action. It's the politics of running a country with hundreds of millions of people to rally.
Again, seeker posted about the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 signed by Bill Clinton.
Read Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 here
Although it states in section 8 that this act does not prescribe military action, it was pre-9/11 which marked a drastic shift in U.S. tolerance for nations of potential threat.
Being wrong does not mean telling a lie.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
What you say about the millions in protest before the war is true enough, but for the most part I can say that they were numbskulls hopping on the bandwagon.
There were legitimate protesters out there, but I am saying a large percentage were self-servers.
Here's the lineage of the Anti-War lemming.
-Vote for Gore.
-Get pissed after election is decided against you.
-Ignore possibility (note possibility) that Bush did NOT rig election and develop an inescapable hatred of Bush seeking to demonize everything he does (this is the big one)
-Bush makes policy to invade Iraq on "selling point" of the WMD.
-Protest the war, not because people think there are no WMD, but because "It's all about the Oil" or some other oversimplified catch-phrase. Thank communists for throwing another great rally for "peace"
-WMD info may be wrong. Automatically assume it is all a bunch of lies. Ignore any information from the Clinton era or from other Intelligence sources.
-Think that since another point to the war would be economic security, that it must be so the fat cats can line their pockets. Not that that will not happen, but come on, when has it not. It's basically a moot point.
I have no problem with honest dissention, but I loath these cookie cutter anti-war "protesters" who mimic every ultra-liberal who spews the unsubstantial arguments they take as fact.
Don't worry though, we have plenty of sycophants on out side too and they make me sick.
Here are some idiot lines from Conservatives that show the speaker is an utter moron (in the effort of fairness).
-You are Un-American - This is about as bogus as it gets. A true ignoramus uses this line.
-Saddam was a WMD - I am truly about to barf. Even if he was, it's just so trite and stupid to say that it boarders on retarded.
-You should support the president - Spoken like a true idiot. No one SHOULD support the president. It's a choice lined out in the Bill of Rights, and by the way, the founding fathers were fond of dissent. Those damn traitors.
There's more to be sure, but to continue would make my head hurt.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
I'm not sure what TWATS is, although I hope it's not the slang usage.
Yes, I hate the insubstancial bull# that goes on in my camp MORE than anything else.
Makes us seem like a bunch of lemming idiotic cowboy types who have zero compassion, respect, or information.
People in general just make me mad sometimes
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Hahahahaha, Doll (aka house boy), do you know anything?
Or are you going to come in here and take on us all with pitiful and totally ungrounded vomit?
I think the latter is more likely. You can not help being distroyed by BOTH sides for lack of knowledge and insight, but at least try to put up a respectable fight before you leave crying.