Hollow Earth : The NASA Proof

I too was intrigued by the story of the hollow earth,but then reality sets in,in all the hundreds of years how many ships passed through this area,if it were true there would be countless storys regarding it,I guess I'll have to say I am very skeptical of it

reply to post by no_one817

---

my friend you have much to learn about gravity , it is not the mass of an object that creates gravity as popular belief has it . research more , and you will find the truth ,

Just remember it is not mass which creates gravity

reply to post by Researcher

---

Since you seem to know everything about our poles, with no first hand knowledge to speak of, then perhaps we should do away with "alernative science" and instead take everything you say as gospel truth.

1) I said nothing about the poles in my post. I merely pointed out that we don't need 18 pictures of ice every day.



Congratulations. That is the one thing you got right.

Read "Lost tribes and lost continents" by Robert Wauchope. Bottom line: The world is full of people who do not have what it takes to be real experts. So they make up bogus knowledge and ignore reality. Decree them selves to be experts. Only works with other equally self delusional people.

Wauchope had your number.

reply to post by Researcher

---

In case you didn't realise it already I was being sarcastic!

Do you know what sarcasm is?

reply to post by Rigel

---

Can I ask you a question, why on hollow earth is this posted in AREA51 AND OTHER FACILITIES?

reply to post by rocksarerocks

---

From the OP:



I think that is why the thread was posted in the "Area 51 and other Facilities" forum...

What if Gravity were not a pull, but a push? A constant expansion of the planets and the universe and all bodies of mass at exactly the same rate so that it would not be recognised as a push but felt as a pull? According to Mark McCutcheon in his book The Final Theory this is exactly the case and solves many mathematical problems relating to a final theory. I am a fan of the hollow earth theory and have photographs of planets in the making, and existing planets which seem to indicate that the two poles of each planet are indeed 'holes' and can exude light. Of course I may be just mis-interpreting the images to fit my preferred theory but if I can figure out how to post the photos you can judge for yourself.

Sorry, cannot figure out how to paste photos, any information on how to do so would be helpful, thanks.

A Hollow Earth?
Geophysics tells us otherwise...in fact, common sense tells us otherwise.
Sure, there may be some 'deep' cave systems, but they still just scrape the surface (you wouldn't want to get too close to the Aesthenosphere).
Nope, don't buy this one!

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

---

Hi, EarthCitizen07 & all !

Speaking of sarcasm, it makes me ask the next sarcastic question:

In the pro-hollow-earth persons here, how many of you are in
the "Rael" group/sect/cult ??? B-)))

Blue skies.

Evidence Link to Hollow

Lets read :



I'm going to provoce you further.
This expanding Earth Flash anim. sure as sodapop makes more sense than the Pangaea theory... Yes it does..
Flash exPanding Link

Now look at the Pangea . What makes the most sense ? the continents arent even together here...
Pangaea anim

reply to post by rat256

---

Yes I agree that there those out there who will never be convinced of anything out of the norm unless it is approved by Jerry Springer Oprah or DR. Phil.

What I am waiting for is who ever the people are that are in control of the various vaults where the "REAL" pictures, films, and videos that are uncut un edited uncensored unblurred n unobscured get a conscious n some how, let it all out.

Of course all the professional skeptics will look for any reason not to believe what they are seeing. These types of people are with out question the biggest self defeatists that there are. The normal trash will start to come out mouths, 1st n foremost one being "FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!" Unfortunately the evidence is not always accessible. However, just because the evidence is not accessible, does not mean that it does not exist. Question for the swaggering skeptics. Say you went to the lake to go swimming n someone stopped you n said,"DO NOT GO INTO THE LAKE, THERE IS A BIG ALLIGATOR IN THERE WHO ATE ONE OF MY FRIENDS!" Are you gonna come back with, "Where is the evidence?" If the person says, "THE ALLIGATOR ATE MY FRIEND N THERE IS NOTHING LEFT OF MY FRIEND! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, MY FRIEND IS GONE N THE ALLIGATOR HAS DOVE DOWN BELOW THE SURFACE SO YA CAN'T SEE IT." Will you the nonbelieveing swaggering arrogant skeptic come back with something like, "UNLESS I SEE AN ALLIGATOR OR SOME CHEWED UP BODY, I'M GOING SWIMMING AND UNTIL I SEE EVIDENCE OF AN ALLIGATOR, I WON'T BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ONE IN THIS LAKE". You would then prove without question that you are the most arrogant moron in the world! "No alligator has bitten me before, so why should I believe that one would bite me now?" You kidding me?

Just for those who have read this n are now whining about what I have said here, I can use this scenario for many varying topics. What I have tried to do here is to show how idiotic skeptic mentality can be.

OK now, go ahead n roast me with all of the swaggering arrogant condescending skeptic tone that you love to attack with.

I'm on the fence with this one. I've always had a problem with the theory but, there are people on both sides who I respect. The inner so-called sun is supposed to be a large crystal not a fusion reactor. Sheldan Nidle and his sources, the ets from Sirius-B, have the most detailed info. I've seen. They say no stars are fusion reactors. I guess they are in agreement with the electric universe model. But I also agree with the point that light should be visable through those holes 24/7 if they were there. Check Nidle's DVD "Journey To Joy"


www.paoweb.com...

star, and flag for the op. I like the topic, and many questions remain unanswered regarding the topic. The idea of a 1,400 mile wide opening at the pole seems a possibility to me; for many reasons.

Hi, pole fans.

I did see/read recently that the first submarine to
cross under the ice via the north pole was the Nautilus.

www.thecarolinascoop.com...


library.osu.edu...


www.history.com...


. . .etc. . .etc. . .

Blue skies.