It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apc
So your problem isn't their record profits, but just the profits themselves.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Originally posted by apc
You don't have an argument. You have a rant.
Please. I've already proven that your "point" about Exxon's record profits is BS.
Originally posted by apc
Originally posted by Solarskye
Do you know anything about net profit margin?
I'm glad someone is pointing this out quickly. Not knowing a thing about operating a business, the anti-capitalists always are quick to jump on this crap.
think-progress doesn't.
Originally posted by apc
sigh...
2006: 10.45%
2005: 9.75%
2004: 8.50%
2003: 8.71%
2002: 5.60%
2001: 7.20%
2000: 7.61%
Their profit margin has risen less than 3% since 2000, most of that during the invasion of the Middle East. Exxon's prices reflect market supply and demand. If OPEC is thinking, "Hey... we might get nuked soon" guess what... prices goes up! Now whether or not Exxon gets their oil from them is irrelevant. Exxon sells at the price the market decides.
You want something to whine about? Whine about the jacked up taxes. Whine about the war. But take your anti-capitalist rhetoric to an economics class and in the mean time buy Exxon stock.
Everything else you've stated has been victim-mentality wealth-envious communist-humping garbage. If you want to continue on about how evil those who make wise decisions in life are, go right ahead. You're right, it is a game. And you're the loser because I've got the trump card: Freedom.
So, anything to add about Exxon's record profits? Or just more about the evil rich people?
Exxon Mobil reported $9.4 billion in profit for the quarter, but Wall Street was less than pleased with their results. Profit was down 10% from the same quarter last year and failed to meet analysts' expectations. The company reported revenue of $102.3 billion but rising costs consumed much of that.
During the third quarter, crude oil rose from $71 a barrel to $81. These costs did not translate into higher gasoline prices for consumers, however, as the national average fell from $2.95 to $2.81 in the same period. This failure to keep up with the rising costs of crude is the main reason why companies like Exxon Mobil and their competitors have seen such a decline in profits. It is not, however, the only reason; Exxon pumped out less oil, down 100,000 barrels per day from the previous year. The company cited three reasons for this decline: OPEC production quotas, maturing oil fields and halting operations in Venezuela, calling this "the impact of entitlements, divestments, OPEC quota effects and Venezuela." Excluding the decline from these problems, production increased by 3 percent, mostly from Russia and Africa.
These rising costs and falling profits are going to lead to change in the fourth quarter for all oil companies. Crude oil hit a new high of $96 this week, and continues to hover above $90. Analysts expect that these high costs will not be coming down soon and are going to be passed on to consumers, predicting prices above $3 per gallon by next year.
Regardless of how demand changes, however, companies like Exxon Mobil are going to have to think of new ways to cut costs if they want to increase profits. Shell (RDS.A: Charts, News, Offers) is currently forging ahead with new research in using oil shale as a commercial energy source, expecting that they can produce oil at $30 a barrel compared to the $90 they are currently paying for crude if their methods are successful. Exxon hasn't announced any similar plans for alternative energy sources to offset their dependence on crude, but they did spend $7 billion during the quarter buying back shares and $5.4 billion on exploration; maybe they ought to start talking to scientists.