Originally posted by northwolf
I know for sure that most NATO forces won't allow the srebrenicha to happen again[edit on 26-1-2008 by northwolf]
Do you really thinkt that this is why NATO intervened in the first place? Because U.S./NATO felt such sympathy for poor Albanian guerillas and separatists, who under slightly different circumstances would gladly take up a arms against Americans? Sure we all heard the sob stories by the Western media, about Serbians killing here, Serbians killing there... But the decision makers who decided to go to war, could not care less about Albanians, local civilians, or anybody besides their lobbyists and interest groups in the West.
Albanians were never U.S. allies. They never will be. NATO cares about them about as much as it cares about the Sudanese genocide victims. Srebrenica was nothing more than a pathetic justification for a biased intervention by NATO. If someone in the U.S. (Clinton?) didn't find a good enought reason to weaken the Serbs, you would have never known about Srebrenica. You know - ethnic cleansing continued in Kosovo after NATO arrived right?
Originally posted by northwolf
but are they capable of interviening if Serbs use heavy armor...
More like are they willing to intervene? KFOR does not want to fight, and it is not there to fight. They much rather abandon that mess of a country and go home. And Kosovo is hardly a military priority for the U.S. Serbs are more inclined to fight and have a better morale, because they are fighting to defend their country. Members of KFOR are policing to collect a paycheck and receive a service ribbon.
Originally posted by northwolf
I know for sure that for example Finnish force has 112mm APILAS recoilleses as their sole AT firepower, but if ordered to fight, they will...
And what does Finland stand to gain from such an engagement, where there could be numerous potential casualties? Who is Finland going to defend? Civilians? Guerillas and insurgents? Terrorists? You never know - you might be giving your life to save a terrorist who would not think twice about cutting your head off. You might be defending a bunch of insurgents who are making plans of killing civilians on the other side. It is not like Fins are defending their own country like in the Winter War. The other side is way more determined and passionate here.
Originally posted by northwolf
But i can't say that all forces will, swedes have been in trouble using force to break down riots, can they handle real battle?
Even if they can, they would hardly want to. It all comes to Swedish politicians who weight the consequences of the evening news reporting that dozens of Swedes are dead defending god knows what from god knows who, for no obvious reason.
That is the thing - If Serbia really gets up to fight, KFOR's patience and willingness to remain there is very questionable. And if Russia intervenes, KFOR/NATO will be paralyzed and might as well get out, for fear of igniting a conflict with Russia. Nobody needs Kosovo or cares about it as much as Serbs, not even local Albanians. To NATO it is just a matter to pissing off Russia, and believe me - that is not the most paramount of their priorities. And this is the reason why Serbs will be there, fighting long after after NATO leaves.


. Also Romania, Greece, Slovakia and Spain don’t support Kosovo
independence. But they are under heavy pressure, but by time, they can’t resist pressure from USA and major EU countries (UK, Germany and
France).
And I am pretty sure that one Russian general confirmed it.
