It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by autowrench
Originally posted by Old Man
Michael Tsarion is nothing but a new age deceiver.
Just like David Icke.
Get a life, people.....
Prove your statement. I think you don't know what your talking about.
If you do, post links, and your proof.
While I don't subscribe to "Old Man"s tripe, I wuld like to oint out that David Icke, and ALL of the others of his "ilk" have no proof either.
I would make a statement very much like that; these peole who are spreading much of this cra are nothing more than misguided channelers wh are only telling you what you want to hear, and most of what they say is entirely "made up". Everything I've read about the Annunaki, Drac's, etc. has been pure fabrication.
Originally posted by autowrench
Does any theory have any real proof?
And how about the Jesus/God/Holy Spirit channellers? Are they spreading tripe and innuendo too?
How do you KNOW, beyond any doubt whatsoever, that a channelled message is not the truth, and is, in your own words, misguided? The truth of the matter is, AnthraAndromda, all you have is theory and hypothesis too.
I am a channeller. I have posted a little of the information I have gained in this forum. Most of it is for me alone. This is my truth, not yours. Your truth may be a lie to me. My truth may be a lie to you.
Before making such a blanket statement, perhaps one needs to look at what subjective truth is first?
And further, anyone who thinks the Ancient Sumerian People where scratching fiction cuneiform writing into clay tablets for a good laugh at future people needs their head examined. The Sumerian's were writing down their History, what they saw, heard, and experienced in every day life.
I am a reasonable trained, and experienced telepath. Themethods, and techniques of transferring information the subconscious to the conscious mind in both (channeling and telepathy are very much the same. The issues arising in this "transfer" are the same, and can be rather subtle, The mind tends to "translate" these subconscious "thought forms" based on the individuals own experience, and, it tends to exclude other's experience. In channeling there is no other, and the channeler is left with only himself. In telepathy, the receiver can draw upon the senders set of experience, and arrive at a far superior translation of the original thought form.
I thought I alluded to the fact that what I have is theory.
May I ask where you received your training? My own telepathic skills have always been with me. Along with a few other abilities that paints me completely crazy to mainstream psychology.