Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
I watched that shockumentary over a year ago.
A year ago, eh. Well thanks for that. Although I never claimed that those 2-part videos at the top of the OP were new. Just new to me. I don't know
if those have been posted here at ATS before, so I figured I better after I saw them. One of the things that videos make hard to do is search for on
ATS. It is meant for more technically minded truthers, and may bore the people seeking obvious, easy to understand evidence.
So if the "true believers" are sitting on all of this slam-dunk evidence..what..exactly..are you waiting for?
Is this just a hobby to make you feel scandalous? enlightened? Special?
None of the above. I think what many people want is a new, impartial, REAL investigation with the power to subpoena. An investigation that will either
silence us forever proving the official story or reveal the true culprits. It is important to note that what this post seeks is concensus that there
were indeed explosions prior to collapse. I don't hear one of you, or anyone else so far arguing anything against those two videos at top of OP.
Their methodology is succinct, accurate, and hard hitting.
So note the following:
1) We've got these videos showing us with a pretty good degree of certainty that there were explosions.
2) We've got eyewitness testimony from multiple sources supporting the same.
3) We've got additional evidence and testimony from people like Jones showing traces of thermite/mate.
4) We have other evidence of at least one van, and possibly more that were loaded with explosives in what appears to be a backup plan or part of the
plan (which may have been foiled) to bring down the towers. What I want to know is why in the hell were the two guys who were apprehended (and
apparently beaten by firefighters) released after 72 hours? Why was no investigation done into these people?
I mean, at the very least, there are so many things that are pointing to the 911 Commission's investigation and report being incomplete and
superficial, and laden with conflict of interest, that a new investigation is most definitely in order.
What I am leaning towards is that the towers were brought down through a combination of conventional CD charges and thermite/mate, and placed and
timed in new creative ways that have never been done before.
As to motives, I think discussion of such is premature, until an investigation is done that we can rely on.
How does rehashing, and micr-analysing "stuff" from years past and acting like it is a 'new' revelation change anything?
It doesn't. We need a new investigation.
How could you get this movement actually moving, instead of dying?
This might possibly be achieved with the election of someone like Ron Paul, who will be a true people's President that can be trusted. I think that
someone like him would be willing to listen to this evidence and on its basis would call for a new investigation, seeing that in the face of all this
evidence- the 911 Commission was a joke, and is in no way to be trusted.
? 
