Originally posted by LockwithnoKey
The OP is full of it.
If it was really him there is no way that he'd be posting here like this.
Where would he post, then? ATS is likely the most structured and serious
(if I may use that word for this topic) Alternate Theory
study site on the 'Net, and certainly seeing how hostile some have reacted to this OP (and that's with our
'open minds'), how much worse
his reception someplace else?
No, it was not good the lies he told, whether for revenge or otherwise, and anger is certainly to be understood for those who feel it regarding the
Macbeth accounts. Yet, we voice our rage, disgust, and discontent in thread after thread about how governments are taking away Rights, how Habius
Corpus protection has been trodden upon by the very Authorities meant to uphold it, then turn right around and
try and convict a new poster
with zero evidence, zero compassion, a judgement based upon pure emotion alone.
IF you had done what Jesse Macbeth has done, and
IF you had been found guilty of it as a crime and
suffered jail punishment for it, and
IF you indeed felt remorse when that drama was all over . . . if
ATS were not an
option for you to at least
attempt to speak
(because as long as his heart beats he should have the right to speak, to present his
case for consideration by peers, then a silencing judgement if found guilty of further dishonesty), where, then, would be a good spot
to open one's heart?
The point I'm getting at is not whether the real Macbeth is actually on this forum, and
if so, guilty or not; I'm wondering do we dare
promote a mature example of how volatile situations like this are dealt with (prior to further evidence), intellectually speaking. Guilty until proven
innocent . . . that's the NWO way, no?
Otherwise, how is ATS different?