Is holography currently available for use and misuse?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 02:52 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to
post by jfj123



You are wrong.

Prove it.

Which blatantly implies you neither read the article, nor did any other study on holography with laser tech.

Or you haven't or don't understand what you read.

Now do you want to tell us magicians' "disappearing" and "reappearing" elephant is not 3-D laser technology?

Yes that is exactly what I'm telling you.
As a matter of fact that was one of the tricks they showed how was done on the TV show Breaking the Magicians Code: Magic's Biggest Secrets Finally Revealed.

Do you also contend DEW has not existed for many years either?

Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) have existed for quite some time. They are LASERS, MASERS, Particle Beam Weapons, etc..

Holography was developed on the same concept as DEW , with or without the radioactivity.

No, although holography, in some cases, uses lasers, that was not the original concept.
Here's a bit of history about holograms

Holography was invented in 1947 by Hungarian physicist Dennis Gabor. The discovery was an unexpected result of research into improving electron microscopes.
There are several types of holograms:
Transmission holograms such as those produced by Leith and Upatnieks, are viewed by shining laser light through them and looking at the reconstructed image from the side of the hologram opposite the source. A later refinement, the "rainbow transmission" hologram allows more convenient illumination by white light rather than by lasers or other monochromatic sources.

This is of course very basic info.

[edit on 23-1-2008 by jfj123]


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 02:54 PM by OrionStars
reply to post by Essedarius



Perhaps you better study the history of magic as well. Houdini was on acting stages, with lifts that dropped the elephant under the stage. The elephant was moved off the lift. The lift was raised back to floor level once again. Modern magic shows involve lasers placing an "elephant" outdoors, and "disappearing" the same "elephant", which then "reappears" in the middle of a highway. Laser tech.

Modern magicians are not necessarily using stages any longer. They prefer to "disappear" and "reappear" their "buildings, elephants, and Statues of Liberty" etc. in the great outdoors, primarily via the miracle of television. They even successfully "disappear" and "move" their holograms wherever they please. The Statue of Liberty will still be where it was. It is the "disappearing" of it which becomes the first illusion.



reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 02:56 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to
post by jfj123



What makes you think there was not one? The images can be projected from land, sea or air.


Prove it


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 02:58 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to
post by Essedarius



Perhaps you better study the history of magic as well. Houdini was on acting stages, with lifts that dropped the elephant under the stage. The elephant was moved off the lift. The lift was raised back to floor level once again. Modern magic shows involve lasers placing an "elephant" outdoors, and "disappearing" the same "elephant", which then "reappears" in the middle of a highway. Laser tech.

Modern magicians are not necessarily using stages any longer. They prefer to "disappear" and "reappear" their "buildings, elephants, and Statues of Liberty" etc. in the great outdoors, primarily via the miracle of television. They even successfully "disappear" and "move" their holograms wherever they please. The Statue of Liberty will still be where it was. It is the "disappearing" of it which becomes the first illusion.


Sounds great !!! Prove it.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:01 PM by OrionStars
reply to post by jfj123



The article proved it. What did you fail to comprhend on the article which prove sophisticated availability long before 9/11/2001? You said you read the article, but did you comprehend it?


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:03 PM by OrionStars
reply to post by jfj123



You are simply arguing for the sake of argument. It is obvious that is your only intent. Argue with yourself. I loathe arguing to argue. I enjoy debate not illogical arguing to argue.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:09 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to
post by jfj123



The article proved it. What did you fail to comprhend on the article which prove sophisticated availability long before 9/11/2001? You said you read the article, but did you comprehend it?


Please be specific about which parts of the article show that advanced holographic technology is available to create a completely realistic 3-d coherent moving image without the need for any medium. In addition, the hologram would need to reflect sunlight and emit sound including audio doppler shift.

I am not trying to be a smart @ss, I seriously couldn't find that anywhere in the article. Please post the sections you are referring to so myself and everyone else can see what you're referring to. I would appreciate it and am not arguing just to argue, just trying to get solid factual information.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:14 PM by earthman4
reply to post by Griff




steam or smoke is used to project the beam on. If there was some technology able to do half of what would be necessary to fool us, I want it. I could make so much money with a projector like that.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:18 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by Griff
What about this technology?

Similar?


The Heliodisplay is an awesome interactive tactile 3D display that projects images in midair that one can “touch”, causing the objects to react. OhGizmo secured an interview with the inventor of this technology, Chad Dyner.



www.gearlive.com...

ohgizmo.com...



And it has been invented already.

Note the "in mid-air" also. Meaning no substrate is needed for the projection. At least that is what I got out of it.



Actually the Helio Display does require a medium. Here's some info about it.

Though the details are kept a closely-guarded secret, Dyner was willing to provide a general description of the way the Heliodisplay works.

Displaying an image using conventional projectors requires a non-transparent medium, typically screens, walls, or even water, but air, which is transparent, cannot be used.

the Heliodisplay creates a particle cloud by passing the surrounding air through a heat pump, which in turn cools the air to a level below its dew point, where it condensates, and is then collected to create an artificial cloud. The particle cloud is composed of a vast number of individual micro droplets, between 1-10 microns in diameter, too small to be visible to the naked eye, held together by surface tension.


The medium is micronized water droplets.

You'll also notice that any Helio Display holograms are shown in a darkened, environmentally controlled room.



reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:28 PM by Griff
reply to post by jfj123



Thanks for the info. Still doesn't involve a medium that has to be put in place before hand right?


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:30 PM by OrionStars
reply to post by jfj123



I should not have to do that since you stated you read it. If comprehending the article, you would need no further explanation. Why do you keep doing that? It serves no logical purpose.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:32 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by Griff
reply to
post by jfj123



Thanks for the info. Still doesn't involve a medium that has to be put in place before hand right?



The whole display is micronized droplets and the interaction happens as follows

The M2i model includes a proprietary system, called Heliocast, for interactively controlling the displayed image. A sensor inside the M2 identifies the movement of the user's hand in the area of the projected image and the Heliocast software calculates the movement of the object projected.

Hopefully this helps.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:34 PM by OrionStars
reply to post by IvanZana



You have a right to your opinion the same as anyone else.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 03:36 PM by jfj123
reply to post by OrionStars



I already told you I couldn't find the info. You say it's there, as a courtesy, I am asking you to post the relevant info here, as I have done. If it's really there, surely you can post it here??
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags