The Tehachapi Covert Underground Complex, page 3

reply to post by exnyconnection

---

would you be interested in more crap? check out the thread rabbit holes - searching for alice. crap or not this would be an interesting vacation spot for you to check out. god's country. remember to wear your gps. bear creek is just over the ridge. you can camp there.

I wonder where this nice little work of fiction came from.

Source:
www.geocities.com...

1.3.3
SIMs:
Security Interdiction Machines (SIMs), are the key component of the system. These machines are remote controlled robots, that use electrogravitic levitation (T.T. Brown style) for mobility. They are self contained, and include a rechargeable power source, an anti-personnel EM field generator, a flight control/propulsion system, a low power radar based terrain avoidance/target detection system, GPS navigation, a visual/infrared "gun camera", and a EM based command/control link. A SIM has the appearance of a silvery ball, approximately 75 centimeters in diameter. They make no detectable sound during flight, and are therefore very stealthy, especially at night.

The SIMs primary weapon is an anti-personnel EM field generator. This field generator interacts with the nervous system of animals including humans, and most ETs. The range of reported effects include pain, paralysis, partial or full unconsciousness (including "missing time" events). At it's most aggressive setting, the EM field generator is capable of causing near instantaneous death from respiration/heart failure. The effective range of the EM field generator is strictly limited, and is most likely no more than 6 meters for mild effects, and 3 meters for death. Under extreme circumstances, SIMs may also use a Kamikaze style suicide impact to disable the target.

While the author urges complete avoidance of the Tehachapi underground complex in general, and SIMs in particular, should any individual inadvertently encounter a SIM, the potentially lethal nature of these devices argues strongly for a policy of destruction on sight. Therefore, I offer the following information, from the strictly limited perspective of self defense.

Since SIMs depend on a rechargeable power source, their flight endurance is limited. Use of the anti-personnel EM field generator will further deplete their power source, especially if used multiple times, or at the more aggressive settings, or near the limit of effective range. Also, the T.T. Brown style propulsion method places severe limits on SIMs weight. The implication being that SIMs are NOT armored, and therefore should be highly vulnerable to any form of mechanical impact, including small arms fire. Finally, their high rate of electrical power consumption should make them easily detectable with infrared sensor equipment.

No picture of an operational SIM is currently available. (GO FIGURE.)


[edit on 24-3-2008 by rocksarerocks]

reply to post by Shadowhawk

---

Yeah, but I know Steve, and he doesn't do anything without several reasons.

Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags

\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags

Old Forgotten Bunker?
  Posted 19 days ago with 4 member flags

Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags

YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: