It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mars Humanoid Figure confirmed??

page: 8
21
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 10 2008 @ 07:06 PM
link   
The "something in the sky" is not in the sky, it appears in the same place in other photos from that camera (the left front HazCam), so it must one or two dead pixels or dirt.

As for the images of the leaning rocks, here they are, cropped, resized to 200% and with levels adjusted to be more perceptible.




Unfortunately, we don't have yet access to the raw, uncompressed IMG files.




posted on Feb, 10 2008 @ 08:39 PM
link   
thanks for the blow ups armap.

that has got to be at the top of my Mars rover weird anomalies list.

It just doesn't look natual. It looks "set up" or openning.

You'd think they'd move the rover over there for a real good look.

Or they did but didn't show us.



posted on Feb, 10 2008 @ 11:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
The "something in the sky" is not in the sky, it appears in the same place in other photos from that camera (the left front HazCam), so it must one or two dead pixels or dirt.

As for the images of the leaning rocks, here they are, cropped, resized to 200% and with levels adjusted to be more perceptible.




Unfortunately, we don't have yet access to the raw, uncompressed IMG files.


ArMap, thanks again for the blow up of the 2 pics. The first pic shows what appears to be 2 leaning rocks instead these are 2 lifeforms and 1 cyborg leaning or holding each other and directly to the left of them you will see a profile of a larger female face including eyes an eyebrow looking left. If you look carefully at the pic you will see a lifeform in the group that looks similar to a light colored E.T. and there are other overlapping faces to the left and right.

The garbage can looking anomalie is a robot remember R2D2 you got that right Star Wars. You do not see the detail at first but keep looking. Most will not see what I see especially the faces and triangular tread housing on the robot and that is perfectly alright if you do not see these things there are plenty more anomalies to see. Look to the the middle toward the bottom 1/3 of pic you will see a tiny tiny Sandmarie maybe 1 to 2 inches tall and toward the bottom right you will see a manufactured part laying on the surface. Rik Riley







[edit on 11-2-2008 by rikriley]



posted on Feb, 11 2008 @ 12:56 PM
link   
Great find, ArmaP.

Wodda-heck?? Nearly perfectly-square 'stone plaqueard' - propped up by picture frame type 'stand.' Possibly a Martonian 'family portrait'?
JK

Now, you have to admit... the odds against that are... pffftt!! If something like that was found on Earth - we would pretty much take it for granted that it was placed by humans. ( I don't think fish... or rain... can do that sort of thing. )

Yes... 'does not constitue 'proof' of anything' - but it is a marvelous 'coincidence' - one must admit. Almost looks like a road marker - or some type of memorial set up there. Weird... and interesting. But that truely is the spirit... and the point of OP. Granted, unless we personally go to Mars - we will NEVER be able to prove any of this - but the 'resemblances' are mounting at a staggering pace.

The 'Humanoid figure' is truely just one example - of numerous and interesting finds in the JPL images. Now we have posted some 4 or 5 pages of 'coincidences' - in that series of webpages...

Mars-Gate webpages expanded

I hope that; regardless of which side that viewers find themselves concerning this on-going debate : they will notice and appreciate that the inquiry is sincere.

I think that the next step would be to review the European and Japanese space images. See if there are multiple anomolies in their pictures as well.

Again... good work on those recent finds.

jb
..



posted on Feb, 11 2008 @ 04:57 PM
link   
Nice find Armap! That is very wierd indeed.

That is what this is all about, finding and pointing out the unusual and hoping one day we humans can actually go and identify what has been intriguing us for so long.

Once again, nice find Armap.

Star



posted on Feb, 11 2008 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Johnbro
If something like that was found on Earth - we would pretty much take it for granted that it was placed by humans. ( I don't think fish... or rain... can do that sort of thing. )
I consider those stones interesting not because they are leaning against each other but because they are the only ones to be in that position as far as we can see (although we can not see too far because of the type of lens used by those cameras).

This thing in an area with rocks slabs but with signs of some kind of geological activity (faults, for example, both horizontal and vertical) or in what could be seen as ancient river bed, could be considered "normal" because then they would be in a place where we could see signs of the forces that may have put them in that position, but in a place like that, without any signs of external forces, makes me consider them something unusual and "out of place".

Unless Spirit has done it.



posted on Feb, 11 2008 @ 07:50 PM
link   
that is cool pictrs arpm. I am copy that ones



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 09:04 AM
link   
You guys are KILLING ME with work.The same pick where one guy sees as just rocks,I blow up and throw negative on and find over 20 EASY FACES.These are mostly tiny,but not all.Some mix of humanoid or near human.There's so much more I can't show you here from same pic.



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 09:56 AM
link   
reply to post by vze2xjjk
 


vze, good work again exactly, everyone must look for two eyes there is a tiny tiny civilization on Mars it is so incredible hardly anyone will believe it possibly. Where most humans on Earth make their mistake is when scanning or viewing the ground zero photos from Mars they look at the so called rocks when in most cases they also need to look into the dirt like a hologram in depth. It is the program NASA is using to overlay things with a veil to hide or distort the anomalies in many instances.

This is right out of Twilight Zone but real tiny tiny humanoid hybrid beings I call Sandmaries do exist. There is so many lifeforms on Mars your head will spin when many will finally learn the truth that yes, life exists on Mars.

Soon will be the time when I release photos beyond a shadow of a dought life does exist on Mars. Rik Riley





[edit on 12-2-2008 by rikriley]



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 10:13 AM
link   
reply to post by rikriley
 

Why tease us? Just post the pics to prove it please. Where did you get the name sandmaries anyway? Do they walk through a dust layer? Why are they always buried?



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 10:17 AM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Those leaning rocks are neat but could happen naturally. They could have broken off from rocks uphill and rolled downhill until they came to rest on a small sand dune. Then the wind could have blown away the sand leaving the rocks seemingly propped up. I have seen rocks like this in shatterzones below cliffs in the Olympic Mountain Range of Washington state for instance.



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 11:13 AM
link   
reply to post by stikkinikki
 


Sandmaries, is the name I have given the tiny humanoid hybrids years ago that live on the surface and in the sand of Mars. Many times you will see only their heads, faces and bodies because of the veil or cover up program NASA uses to diguise the lifeforms and anomalies.

I have seen the Sandmaries in pods and this could be for the absorbtion of nourishment for there bodies I do not know for sure. They have tiny tiny satellite dishes and that was apparent during the Pathfinder mission.

Why not show proof of lifeforms on Mars on ATS because this is not the place to do so right now. The unveiling will be of a much greater magnitude outside of ATS. Rik Riley



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by stikkinikki
 


I agree that the rock formation could (and most probably did) happened by natural means, that is why I did not said that it was artificial.


But what I find strange is that I do not see in that area any way of that happening. As you said, they could have fallen (I don't think that flat rocks can roll) in that position, but I don't see from where they could have fallen, if I am not mistaken, this is the rim of the crater where Spirit was "sleeping" during the dust storms.

In fact, both rovers were sent to mostly flat areas of Mars.



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Genoa
 
I have been trying to show people for 4 years that the camera distant focus makes these moving fces SEE THRU,so that living animals surround the rovers quite often,standing abou 3 to 4 or 5 feet tall(Cam level),but the cam only registers them as BLURS with outlines.So when you see BLURS on the horizon below skyline,that's live animals or people.Most people can't see these things because they have not developed their pattern recognition. Some people are color blind or have very poor depth perception or 3D imaging capablities. Play with CONTRAST and NEGATIVE IMAGES to find them. I designed the Mars rovers 1987. jpl123@inbox.com images Photobucket accounts jlehane and j3lehane password IIIIII if needed



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 10:54 PM
link   
The humanoid figure is a..
.
Grey kneeling in meditation
They are known as the Igigi
first named by Zechariah Sitchin



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 11:10 PM
link   
Vze - I do not tell all here - as skeptics will tear it to shreads. But have an inkling what you are referring to - re: focal lengths, ie. What did you mean 'designed rover 1987'?? Can you elaborate?

Snow - the filters extracted 'detail' from one version of face of 'Humanoid' that greatly resembled 'Zeti.' Was not familiar that Sitchin referenced 'greys.'

Interesting posts, folks. Would like to hear more.

jb

..



posted on Feb, 12 2008 @ 11:17 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 
I'm a big fan so here goes.
If you can't see the faces,don't get upset,but just allow my technique to sink in as far as Contrast and Negative to find faces. I always look for matching/parallel eye holes or dots because in nature they don't occur randomly as the same size that frequently.Perfect circles on Mars are a dead giveaway that it's a face.Rocks are never perfect circles.



posted on Feb, 13 2008 @ 12:10 AM
link   
This is reallygreat because recently I found the back spikes of the chinese style dragons(one type) from recent 08 Spirit panorama.



posted on Feb, 13 2008 @ 12:58 AM
link   
Zechariah Sitchin decoded a species called Igigi
(in the 'Lost Book of Enki') but no
mention of Greys.
Other texts mention Greys exist then.
.
Does it not resemble a Grey?
rather than a small Yeti.
(What is a 'Zeti'?)
.
Perhaps this is their true form?
.
It's only about 3-4 ft
and painted
wearing a uniform/robe
is it a priest?
it's a statue mediatating and the
sands cover up the other fellows;
sacredness..
.
Is it not?



posted on Feb, 13 2008 @ 08:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by vze2xjjk
reply to post by ArMaP
 
I'm a big fan so here goes.
If you can't see the faces,don't get upset,but just allow my technique to sink in as far as Contrast and Negative to find faces. I always look for matching/parallel eye holes or dots because in nature they don't occur randomly as the same size that frequently.Perfect circles on Mars are a dead giveaway that it's a face.Rocks are never perfect circles.



Folks vze knows what he is talking about when it comes to his techniques of seeing anomalies on Mars if you will look at the last photo in this series which looks like standing rocks and is not, you will see the being with the pointed headdress slightly bending over and has his hand on the back of the groundlevel lifeform with face. You can actually count 3 fingers on the hand of the being with the pointed headdress. It takes hours and hours to pick up on the Mars digital visual light spectrum code to see these things.

vze is the first person that I have come across that actually can see these things on Mars like myself, and he is not making this up. This is of 1000% certainty vze is seeing these anomalies.

Again for those that can not see these anomalies this will help. Lower your contrast and brightness slightly to about 70% on your monitor and preferable scan or view the Mars ground zero photos in a dark room.

Take your hand make a fist and now open your fingers on that hand slightly to make a tunnel less then the size of a pea. Take your hand and place it up against your best viewing eye and look thru the tunnel focused toward your monitor. Take one inch at a time when scanning the photo and move very slowly to see things and do not become impatient your eyes will refocus it takes time. The reason you are making a fist and looking thru your hand is it blocks the reflecting light that blinds you from the monitor when your scanning. Scanning is the same thing to me as viewing as to not confuse people.

Yes you must look for 2 eyes just like vze states and this is the dead give away when viewing the surface for lifeforms. Look for patterns the lifeforms will be hard to see because they blend in with the surface. He shows you by varying the color spectrum for you can see the tiny tiny lifeforms better. Do not concentrate only on the so called looking rocks that are many times Marrockie and Sandmarie lifeforms, but look at the ground or sand you will see anomalies you think to be impossible to see on Mars. I have been scanning photos for years on Mars it is a learning process to see these things. Rik Riley



[edit on 13-2-2008 by rikriley]



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join