Originally posted by rikriley
reply to post by Beamish
Ok, I know this may go a little off-topic, but I suppose in my defense you are proclaiming you know what the "figure" actually is.
First of all you do not screw your hands together.
in regard to your ability in seeing these hidden "creatures". However, you did say this:
If possible veiw your monitor in a dark room and then take your hand cuping it like your viewing thru a tunnel up against your eye and make the
opening the size of a pea.
Size of a pea? Isn't that making a loose fist, as I stated not "screwing your hands together?
You must also stretch the image when viewing the photo and you can figure the rest out yourself.
So you also deliberately distort the images? Does it not occur that doing that will alter the photo, and any simulacra, into something that,
magically, could look like something else? And why do you have to stretch it in the first place? And as to the last part of that quote; no, I really
don't want to figure the rest out, as I don't think there's anything, as far as your declarations are concerned, to figure out.
Yes I know about stealth technology and how it works how about yourself? Can you see thru the stealths on Mars? Only if you pick up on the digital
I have a loose understanding of stealth tech, ie. the "predator" type as opposed to the current tech that allows aircraft to fly in enemy radar with
no more of a profile than a pigeon.
Or, a duck, maybe.
You state you "know" about this tech, and this infers that you have more knowledge than I do. Maybe you do, and as I'm always willing to learn,
here's your chance; enlighten me as to how it works without using made up, new-age terminology. Just the science.
The only reason I feel you would come at me full blast without trying any of these visual techniques I discribed is that you may be a disinformation
agent. Believe me they are here on ATS denying it or not.
Oh for goodness sake! Can't anyone question such sweeping, grandiose and not to mention fanciful statements as you've made without being branded a
Government agent? People have opinions. You've got yours, I've got mine, and they obviously clash.
If you take the time to peruse my post history, you'll see that I have very strong
beliefs regarding the existence of alien life, not only way
out there in the Universe, but that they are also visiting our planet. To openly brand me a disinfo agent is a darn insult.
I've stood up for the existence of UFOs in the face of ignorance and ridicule all of my life. Being erudite, calm and rational about the subject has
helped me enormously in putting across that the ETH, and the accompanying UFO phenomena, as being real and relevant. I hope in that time I have
actually changed a few people's minds.
Your approach on the other hand is, frankly, ludicrous, and only helps to "alienate" the whole field. Your
approach to this subject, and this
thread in particular, which, may I remind you, was broken to the world by ATS, could well be misconstrued as disinfo, too.
We recieved a million
hits yesterday, and goodness knows how many read posts such as yours only to go away with a bad taste in their mouths and
their preconcieved ideas about all of those being involved in the study of ETH/UFOs being crackpots. Your phrase, BTW, not mine.
As far as not seeing things on Mars that I see I am sorry, but keep trying please do not ever give up.
I have seen several strange, possibly anomalous objects on the Martian surface. Along with Mikesingh's tireless work on ATS, this site in
proposes that Mars is, contrary to popular opinion, replete with life. J Skipper, the researcher who owns the site, has done sterling work to further
that theory, and while sometimes his findings are tenuous, the remainder of his work is incredibly
persuasive. I feel that he may well be
justified in his pursuits in the near future.
The likelyhood of anyone finding ducks
on Mars, however, will not be verified no matter how long you wait.
I was told to use Martonian not Martian because it is offensive. Who told me this you figure it out yourself. You have already branded me in your
minds own imagination.
Ok, here we go. You do realise that you've just insinuated that you have insider knowledge
, don't you?
So "Martian" is offensive?
Has a "Martonian" told you so?
A Nasa employee who's in the know regarding "Martonian" etiquette? And I don't want to figure it out, the onus is not on me, it's on you
to back up this amazing insinuation.
Show you the Mallard duck? You got to be kidding the way you tried to assassinate my character without knowing who you are conversing with I do not
think so. When people are nice to me I give them something nice in return including honey.
I did not try to assasinate your character.
I simply pointed out that you were making bizarre claims without supplying any proof! And as to
"knowing who" I am "conversing with"; veiled threat aside, once again I ask you to enlighten me, see if I can be impressed as easily as those who
you dole "honey" out to.
I have a pretty good idea what
you are; who you are on the other hand, I doubt will impress.
This thread has recieved several inteligent replies, which is to be expected on this forum, and we may well have, once again, solved at least one
small riddle about Mars.
There is so much about that planet that inspires insightful enquiry, not just from ATS, but all around our world. One day soon, by means of disclosure
or blatant, undeniable evidence, we will know the truth, whatever that truth may be.
rikriley, I feel that that day will not be a happy one for you.