It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

250+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns'

page: 5
16
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 09:44 PM
link   
reply to post by OrionStars
 


I have always been one of a kind. I spend the time on this site because I know far too many people who were THERE on that day, unfortunately, they will never log on to this site because the conspiracy folks just piss them off.




posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 09:50 PM
link   


9/11 (5:20 pm) - The 47-story WTC 7 mysteriously collapses even though no plane crashed into it and its collapse hardly gets any media attention.


No, a BUILDING collapsed into it.





sorry dude but it was the small fires that brougth down wtc 7
i asume youve read the raport.

only highrise concrete building to crumble from a few fires in the history of modern building.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by OrionStars
 


Recheck your facts, there were still rivets used in the construction.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
 


I do not know too many people willing to do what you do in these discussions, and not expect to be paid for it.


So if the US Government pays Me.

Then conversely -- Who is paying......you? Hmmmm.

Perhaps YOU are part of an ongoing psycological war that began after 9/11. To divide and undermine the US Systems...

Seems resonable enough to me.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:08 PM
link   
reply to post by zerbot565
 


Sorry dude, but the damage wtc7 suffered when parts of wtc 1 impacted it, contributed to the collapse.

Heres several videos taken of WTC 7 that day

911myths.com...

Small fires? When they are hot enough to cause windows to shatter on floors that ARENT on fire, they aint small



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:15 PM
link   
but then again dude your statements about the venezuelan building being on fire and wtc 7 contradicts with your over all state ment about buildings and fires

no plane hit wtc 7
no building hit wtc 7

yet there where fires inside that brougth down a building for the first time in history in less then 5hours of being on fire and yes they where small fires compared to the venezuelan fire.

ps free fall = CD



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:15 PM
link   
but then again dude your statements about the venezuelan building being on fire and wtc 7 contradicts with your over all state ment about buildings and fires

no plane hit wtc 7
no building hit wtc 7

yet there where fires inside that brougth down a building for the first time in history in less then 5hours of being on fire and yes they where small fires compared to the venezuelan fire.

ps free fall = CD



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:15 PM
link   
Further, WTC7 was steel framed and not concrete.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:20 PM
link   
anyways steel framed or concreet it dosent matter as it fell at free fall speed from "fires",

and no building hit wtc7 as the other wtc buildings collaped on its base at freefall speed ,

the natural way for the large wtc´s would have been to crack at the base of the impact and the rest would still be standing.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by zerbot565
 


Well once again, you are completely wrong. Look at the videos, do you really think all that damage to WTC7 just...happened??? Parts of WTC 1 slammed into WTC 7, cutting (according to FDNY) a 20 story hole down the side of WTC 7.

The fires were far from small...they were widespread and burning unchecked in a building that had suffered severe structural damage. Dude



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:23 PM
link   
care to enlighten me to as why only the wtc series of buildings collapes and not other buildings in their suroundings

you have a logical explenation for that ?



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by zerbot565

no plane hit wtc 7

True


no building hit wtc 7


Blatantly FALSE


yet there where fires inside that brougth down a building for the first time in history in less then 5hours of being on fire


FALSE


and yes they where small fires compared to the venezuelan fire.


Speculation, South side of WTC7 was obsucred by billowing smoke from many floors


ps free fall = CD


FALSE

Sorry man, you have been mislead. The good news is there is credible information out there that you should be able to find.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:26 PM
link   
reply to post by zerbot565
 


The buildings that suffered the most damage and had huge fires? Not that hard to understand.....



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:26 PM
link   
like what the 9/11 comision rapport ?



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by zerbot565
like what the 9/11 comision rapport ?


Nope.



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:28 PM
link   
reply to post by zerbot565
 


Plenty of videos taken that day, and plenty of interviews with the firemen who lived through that day.......



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:37 PM
link   
fire men saying they heard loud booms ?
fire men saying they where told to back of becouse the bulding where gona be pulled
silverstein saying they where gonna be pulled ?

what videos are you refering to

and no i dont see a hughe fire in wtc 7

this is a huge fire

www.cbsnews.com...

[edit on 25-1-2008 by zerbot565]



posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 10:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
And if either of you had bothered to read the first post, I said he REPORTEDLY radioed down that he wanted engineers to assess the building because he was concerned there was going to be a collapse at the impact point.


i'm asking you for a source for this report. REPORTEDLY means someone reported it. who? when? where?
i would like to see the source of this info.



posted on Jan, 26 2008 @ 02:37 AM
link   
If we didnt read your post how would we have known you said anything about him? Give me a break. You still cannot provide a source that he REPORTEDLY said that. I dont understand how you are benefiting, or proving your point by telling us that we are not reading what you wrote.



posted on Jan, 26 2008 @ 02:45 AM
link   
People...The Marriott, which was right next the the trade center suffered 10X the damage that WTC 7 did. www.sept11marriottsurvivors.org...

That building did not collapse. Show me evidence that the damage to WTC 7 was remotely comprable to that. you cant because it was NOT. There is nothing you can post that is going to show that WTC 7 should have collapsed due to fire and structural damage....you want to talk about speculation? Saying WTC 7 suffered enough damage from the collapse of 1 and 2, plus resulting damage, is just a lie.




top topics



 
16
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join