It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Don Killuminati
If you don't believe in the Illuminati then why even join this site?
...if you're so perfect and we're all conspiracy nutbags then you shouldn't care what people think and you should leave.
I don't see how you can join a site aimed towards those that know about the Illuminati, etc if you don't believe it.
Or am I wrong when it comes to what this site is for?
Originally posted by Don Killuminati
Oh and to that Mason that replied first, look, with all due respect, I don't trust ANYTHING a Mason would say.
Number one, if you're a lower branch,
I wouldn't expect you to know about the Illuminati/NWO yet,
so you will think Masonry is oh so totally legit,
just as I wouldn't expect the secretary of your local Mayor to know anything about the NWO
... and if you're a higher branch, you're sent as a disinformation agent, so please do not bother arguing with me.
Originally posted by aleon1018
reply to post by Don Killuminati
I'm wondering who and when people in charge here consider people to be just nut jobs or whatever. Then possibly find them interestingly entertaining for awhile or until they wear out their usefulness and get too many ignores or complaints.
I was under the impression that the real or original Illuminati were glowing extraterrestrials like in the sci-fi movie Cocoon. What's your info on that?
Originally posted by LightinDarkness
reply to post by Don Killuminati
It always amazes me that anyone thinks it is strange that skeptics exist or that they dare question someone's thread...even on a conspiracy forum. Regardless of what some people want to believe, ATS is the interesting place it is ONLY because of this dynamic. If this entire forum was only a place where the conspiracy "faithful" could gather to all agree with each other and pat each other on the back about how smart they are for figuring out X theory, this would be a very dull place.
It is only through critically examining arguments and - yes - even finding some of them to be untrue that we can produce quality research.
I often find that is usually those who propose the most outlandish and inane theories that demand no one question them or critically analyze their claim. This is because they know they would then be exposed...and they often are in the current forum climate.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by Don Killuminati
Oh and to that Mason that replied first, look, with all due respect, I don't trust ANYTHING a Mason would say.
And why might that be?
Number one, if you're a lower branch,
No, I am as 'high-up' as they come.
I wouldn't expect you to know about the Illuminati/NWO yet,
I already stated I was completely aware of the Bavarian Illuminati, if there is another version please direct me to your evidence indicating their existence.
so you will think Masonry is oh so totally legit,
Indeed I do.
just as I wouldn't expect the secretary of your local Mayor to know anything about the NWO
Unless of course the mayor could prove their existence to her, now that would be impressive.
... and if you're a higher branch, you're sent as a disinformation agent, so please do not bother arguing with me.
'Higher branch', what is a 'higher branch'? Perhaps you do not wish to have me discuss this with you because of your complete and total inability to substantiate your claims or assertions would subsequently lead you to retract your non-sensical statements.
The logic used by OP is classic. It is a "your either with us or against us attitude" that puts everyone in two camps: those who believe everything the OP agrees with, or everyone else. Everyone else is - clearly - then a disinformation agent or part of the NWO. When you set up logic like this, you will never listen to reason because your entire premise is wrong - you just refuse to see it.
I already told you don't bother arguing with me. You're a disinformation agent. It's so plain to see.
Originally posted by Choronzon
Alot of topics here a dialectically apposed, so inevitably ATS would house skeptics and supporters for every topic.
Really what you are debating is what lvl of proof should someone require to finalize a conclusion. Well that my friend is different for everyone.
I guarantee that you will find some topic that you are skeptical of. Even though you may be in favor of 99.999% of all conspiracies, there is bound to be something that you find a stretch.
Originally posted by LightinDarkness
Wow. So much for denying ignorance. Just accuse everyone who disagrees with you as being a "disinformation agent."
Originally posted by Don Killuminati
I already told you don't bother arguing with me. You're a disinformation agent. It's so plain to see.
You think the leaders of a random street gang want the public to know their plans?
Originally posted by Don Killuminati
There are so many skeptics on this site, and it amazes me.
If you don't believe in the Illuminati then why even join this site?
It seems like the people who claim they are Masons are here as disinformation agents.
What are you doing here? If Masons aren't so corrupt and apart of the Illuminati then leave...if you're so perfect and we're all conspiracy nutbags then you shouldn't care what people think and you should leave.
I don't see how you can join a site aimed towards those that know about the Illuminati, etc if you don't believe it. The 9/11 section, very few ppl in that section believe it. Well then get the heck out of the section, what's the point in debating if you're not gonna believe ANYTHING unless CNN says it's right?
Or am I wrong when it comes to what this site is for?