Originally posted by IsaacKoi
Which are best cases amongst that mass of material?
In this article I unveil (for the first time on a public forum) the “Top 100” UFO cases based on the frequency of their discussion within 963 UFO/SETI books.
If ufologists wrote books solely with the objective of presenting the best available evidence, then the most frequently discussed cases would be the ones that the most authors regarded as the best cases.
Does the resulting list accord with your view as to the best cases? If not, which cases would you add or remove? Why?
Just a quick post to say that I've done a LOT of work on this topic since starting this thread a few years ago.
I'm making the relevant lists of references available on the Internet and seeking to establish better ways of identiftying the best UFO cases.
Unless some reasonable ways are put forward for identifying the views of the UFO community as which UFO cases are the vest, where are skeptics to start when told there are thousands upon thousands of UFO reports?
To take things to the next level, one of the ideas I'd like to explore is whether any consensus exists as to the RELATIVE merits of UFOs cases if certain specified criteria are applied (aking to Hynek's Strangeness and Credibility Ratings, Vallee's SVP ratings etc), regardless of the views of the people participating in the ratings as to the causes of UFO reports.
I'm planning (work and family commitments permitting - which they often do not) that I'll be able to start a relevant thread in the near future to try a little experiment along these lines.
I hope some of you will act as guinea pigs in that experiment.
All the best,
Isaac


