posted on May, 19 2008 @ 10:54 AM
Originally posted by RuhigSein
reply to post by jritzmann
Well, I didn't ask to know what you know about your opinion on that its a hoax. I asked what you know in detail about the case. The contact
notes...etc... The CASE. A few pictures don't speak for the entire story.
And I'll say again, you can refer to the multiple threads here where I detailed that information. If you refuse to search and read the threads, I
don't know what to tell you-other then you must not care very much about knowing. So stop asking. There answers are there.
I don't concern myself with contact notes, because for me it never got that far. If the initial photos are garbage, I need not go any further,
because the integrity of the case is already in the toilet. However, some have gone into the contact notes and found serious issues with them too.
Look up "Ike42" on google for a comprehensive examination of Meier's writings.
I have (in addition to photo analysis) looked into many of the "experts" testimony such as Malin, Post, Nathan, etc, and found their quotes were
taken severely out of context. Malin told me this flatly.
I recently met Jim Dilettoso who told David Biedny, Jeremy Vaeni and myself that the "Wedding Cake" photos so desperately defended my Horn, were
This coming from the guy who did the original photo analysis on the Meier case...and who's report is on Horn's website. Yeah, he also said his
report was misrepresented.
There's literally no end to the B.S. in this "case". Go look it all up if you're truly interested.