It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UK parliamentary committee calls for biofuel moratorium

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 11:45 PM
link   

UK parliamentary committee calls for biofuel moratorium


www.reuters.com

Most biofuels harm rather than help the environment and the British government should call a moratorium on increasing their use, a parliamentary committee said on Monday.
"Biofuels can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transport -- but at present most biofuels have a detrimental impact on the environment overall," Tim Yeo, chairman of the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) said.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.reuters.com
www.reuters.com
www.reuters.com




posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 11:45 PM
link   
This is the most ridiculous news I've read in a long time!

Biofuels have a detrimental impact? What about the coal and oil-based system we have now? Are we not doing damage to the planet by using mountaintop removal for coal and drilling deep underground for oil?



"There are many different types of biofuels and it's key that the ones we use provide the best greenhouse gas savings and are produced in ways that are good for people and the environment," Dianna Bowles of the Royal Society's biofuels working group said in response to the EAC report.


Algae has been proven to be a great source of fuel, as well as hemp and switchgrass to name a few.

The EAC doesn't want to move forward with biofuel production, but the Royal Society (Science Academy) seems to be using their brains and not thinking with their pocketbooks.


The EAC report said a large biofuel industry based on current technology is likely to increase food prices and could damage food security in developing countries.
Research is under way to develop so-called second generation biofuels which would use waste products rather than food commodities. The committee noted that these technologies are some years away.


However, there is good news in this report:

Britain's National Farmers Union rejected the conclusions.


It seems the farmers are more intelligent than the government gives them credit. They actually know what's going on, go figure. A farmer knows more about reality than a politician.


www.reuters.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 11:47 PM
link   
reply to post by biggie smalls
 


One more quote to add:


"Biofuels represent the only renewable alternative for replacing fossil fuel in transport and a way of tackling one quarter of UK carbon emissions which transport is responsible for," NFU president Peter Kendall said in a statement.

UK biodiesel reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 53 percent and UK wheat bioethanol by 64 percent compared with their fossil fuel equivalents.

Those savings can and should be improved. But for the committee to conclude that, because the savings are small, they are not worth having at all, is illogical and ill-informed," Kendall added.


We need to relinquish our dependence on fossil fuels to renewable energy.

Its quite obvious that oil and coal have a finite supply and the costs are outweighing the benefits at this point.



new topics
 
1

log in

join