It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Lennon and Ghandi were anti-christs???

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 10:37 PM
I firmly believe that religion is evil
and christianity seems to be one of the 2 or 3 leading ones.

Having said that, if christianity is evil then that would pretty much mean that an anti-christ is basically a true saint and not evil at all,

say like

Ghandi and Lennon.

so to me an anti-christ = good, loving, freedom fighting ..ect ect....
anyone think of who else would go on this list if this was the case?

I really don`t care if religious people come down on me for this
but we gotta wake up from these chains of religion.

like, they call Hitler and Napoleon an anti-christ and they probably were both doing the churches bidding in the first place.

any way ..this is not a gimme proof thing, its just a thought that I have.

posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 10:41 PM
The Beatles member Lennon or Lenin as in, Soviet Lenin...?

posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 10:45 PM

Originally posted by mattguy404
The Beatles member Lennon or Lenin as in, Soviet Lenin...?

sorry.....John Lennon and others who had a very strong impact
from their message of peace and love.

[edit on 20-1-2008 by Maya432]

posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 10:48 PM
Ahh, I'm with you now! Interesting theory. You're going to get a lot of posts from people who are going to be ape-poopie over your theory, probably the same ones that believe the next Jewish messiah, or Mohammed, or some other symbol of another religion that isn't 'Their Way' is going to be the next anti-christ...

Irony in a bottle!

[edit on 20-1-2008 by mattguy404]

posted on Jan, 25 2008 @ 09:06 PM
Anti-christ is such a concrete word now I doubt you could convince anyone Ghandi and Lennon were anti-christs. If you were to go around saying "Ghandi and Lennon were anti-christs" to people without first explaining yourself, some might be offended, others probably wouldn't care. But I do understand where you're coming from. They were two people who truly understood how people should live. It's what the main point of religion is supposed to be: love, honour, respect, understand, and embrace your fell men, women, and children. Unfortunately now it's about power and control of the masses.

It's a great thought nonetheless.

posted on Jun, 22 2008 @ 03:10 AM
reply to post by Maya432


well you certainly take the anti-christ term properly atleast. It applies to any person who goes against the teachings of jesus christ, its not a name for one man

to ya there

.....(here it comes) ..... BUT.....

Jesus Christ taught messages of peace, understanding, and Love.
john lennon and gandi preached the same things, just in different contexts.

So to say john lennon and ghandi are anti-christs is to say lennon and ghandi taught hate, injustice, and how to be intolerant

also - im curious
you refer to religion as 'evil'
the idea of evil is from religious origins (good vs evil. god vs satan)


is that any religion?
if so, satanism is a religion....would you consider it good?
Im asking this because i want to understand your usage of "evil"

posted on Jun, 22 2008 @ 04:50 AM
is it popular these days to be anti-christian?

first of all ,i believe in God (or some kind of supreme being) but i'm not following any religion.

i've been seeing lately a lot of attacks on Christianity.
and every time people connect religion with curch.
name me one thing Jesus Christ said that is morally or behaviourly wrong.
His main intentions were peace and love - same as Lennons and Gandhi
calling them anti-christs?

Any kind of Church is a form of antichrist really.

posted on Jun, 22 2008 @ 04:56 AM
UMMM............. NO

I am not even going to READ this thread I am just going to tell you you are SOOOOO completely wrong, that I think you, yourself must be an Antichrist for even TRYING to convince people of such a ridiculous notion......


BEGONE clueless one............

...............................just sayin.

posted on Jun, 22 2008 @ 04:56 AM
reply to post by Maya432

Your theory is twisted and tweaked further than one side or the other... I suggest you think way too much...? It's interesting, but the lord represents simplicity and to concoct such a notion in it's complexity proves my point... In essence your theory is leading others further away from the truth... It might make a good lesson to stimulate ones mind, but other than this it has no basis... Imaginative indeed, nothing more...

new topics

top topics


log in