Asteroid 2007 TU24 has NASA concerned., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 130 times


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 04:37 AM by damajikninja
reply to post by aleon1018


Good eye, aleon1018!! The image of TU24 shown in the YouTube clip and the image of Ida from the NASA site are the same. The author of the YouTube video (www.tu24.org) is either pulling our leg, or using the image of Ida as a reference (in which case they should have mentioned that).

I took a screenshot of the YouTube video and the pic of Ida, and put them side by side for comparison. Check this out:





[edit on 1/20/2008 by damajikninja]


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 04:58 AM by verylowfrequency
reply to post by damajikninja in reference to post by aleon1018



Although it's a good catch, I don't understand why anyone would ask the question when obviously it was easy to find picture for reference in making the comparison as was the fake Sears tower & the unknown tunguska rock.

There was no time to send a space craft to take a picture, so what do you do draw one or use something similiar and put it up next to a known object close to it's size and then stretching or resizing the objects to the same length for comparison.

I think this is a no brainer & a waste of bandwidth making an argument about the obvious. Almost like saying it's only two inches on my screen - how can it do any damage to the earth? Or it's almost as big as the Earth on the JPL tracking chart, they must be lying about it's true size.

Come on people - get a grip! Charts are supposed to make it easier to visualize or conceptualize something they are rarely literal.

I guess it's okay to point out (good eye indeed), but making it a possible conspiracy is too much of a reach for my blood. Let's move on.



[edit on 20-1-2008 by verylowfrequency]


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 05:23 AM by Umbra Sideralis
reply to post by damajikninja



I rise exactly that question in this older topic about the same Asteroid,and the same problem,,but nobody have give importance to what i sayed, soo, i give up...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 20/1/08 by Umbra Sideralis]



reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 05:40 AM by anhinga
...from a forum about said object:

How would we know if TU24 will upset the Earth electrically, without touching the Earth?

Look out for: Unusual weather days before the arrival of TU24.

In an electric solar system electric currents flowing between the solar plasma and the planets are the primary factors driving Earth’s weather patterns. A minor electrical disturbance of the Earth, due to the intrusion of a charged body, could trigger earthquakes, in the same way that electrical sunspot activity influences earthquakes.

The Earth’s atmosphere forms the dielectric of a capacitor with the two "plates" of the capacitor being the Earth and the ionosphere. The asteroid's electrical disturbance will cause pressure pulses in the atmosphere before and during TU24's arrival. (Note: a giant ionospheric disturbance accompanied the magnitude 9.3 earthquake of December 26, 2004)

In the electric solar system, the planets and all comets and asteroids have plasma sheaths that isolate them electrically from the solar plasma. When two plasma sheaths "touch", the two bodies "see" each other electrically for the first time. Thus, the sky will glow.


www.tu24.org...

Since I posted the above a few days ago the PHA list has been updated. Asteroid 2007 TU24 is now calculated to be 27% closer to the orbital path of the Earth.

the MOID for TU24 is now 0.00098 AU instead of .00124995 AU. This means that the asteroid is calculated to reach a distance of 146,000km of Earth's orbital path.

But wait! This page claims a distance of .00096 AU. (This website is the Catalina Sky Survey, the astronomers who discovered the asteroid.)

They already know what the Earth's orbit is going to be. Obviously, they don't know that much about TU24. How could they possibly change the MOID but keep the same miss distance? Are they saying the asteroid will be 27% closer to our orbital path than previously calculated but somehow maintain the same speed and distance as in previous calculations?

What will the next update say?


www.tu24.org...

From a NASA site, there's a couple of 'unknown' fields, that I don't like since there's only days before passing; also, like the person on the aforementioned site says, there's an odd science at work here, a couple of locations are set to view the object only days before it's close approach? Both of these topics are cited in this link:

echo.jpl.nasa.gov...




reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 05:44 AM by verylowfrequency
reply to post by Umbra Sideralis



Read my post above yours. This is exactly why I made my comment, so we wouldn't get too far off subject. I guess it's fruitless at this point - I'm done spoon feeding.

Time to find my rock drawing tools for the wall in my cave, (if you don't get it yet continue) since my notebook battery is going to run out and I won't be able to plug in again.



[edit on 20-1-2008 by verylowfrequency]


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 07:14 AM by mythatsabigprobe
Originally posted by mungodave

Asteroid 2007 TU24 has NASA concerned.


www.godlikeproductions.com
Numerous solutions indicate an Earth impact.. Here is the latest regarding this unfolding catastophic situation
(visit the link for the full news article)



I don't see anything to support this claim, or the title of the thread "Nasa Concerned".

All observations indicate it will pass at approx 1.4 Lunar distances or around 334,000 miles. If you bought a brand new car and set out to drive that distance, it would take over a year and you would probably need to replace the car by the eighth month. It's not what I'd call an "unfolding catastrophic situation"..


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 07:27 AM by Ironclad
reply to post by TheoOne



Dude, go outside & watch the sky?

LOL I live in Australia (Southern Hemesphere), If that thing hits, I'm as good as dead!!!

Hell, I'm gunna go out & get Laied this weekend!!! Bugger standing there doing nothing but just watching the sky!!!

Actually, its a good thing the area I live in is littered with old mines that go Deep, deep under the mountain I live on...!!

Afew 1000 Square meters of Solid rock might atleast offer some protection, Gunna take the GF down there, shag all night & all day & see what happens...lol

Hey, even if nothing bad happens, atleast I would have seen some sort of action...hehehe

[edit on 1/20/2008 by Ironclad]



reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 07:34 AM by Ironclad
reply to post by aleon1018



Anyway, if this thing dose do a near miss, and a bounce back for a full frontal hit, atleast it would have slowed down a little on the rebound.

That might offer a slight reduction in the impact. Not by much, but anything is better than nothing.


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 07:36 AM by illuzian
This is the first thing in a while i've even bothered to reply to, checking out the nasa website:

2007 TU24
2007 WD5

Now with the dates of expected passing/impact its a bit concerning at the least.

I am honestly suprised that this isn't on the news.


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 07:56 AM by Anatomic Bomb
reply to post by illuzian


Well, what hurts more? A sucker punch or one that you know is coming?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags