Asteroid 2007 TU24 has NASA concerned.

reply to post by scrapple

---

Thanks, Scrapple! I appreciate the link to the other thread! How very interesting!

Doyder

reply to post by nightmoon11

---

That is a really amazing picture. The magnetosphere is going crazy.

I think this has more to do with sunspots than NEOs. Then again I'm not a scientist so I can't be certain.

Any magnetosphere buffs care to enlighten us on the reason it could be all lit up?

I know this comes as a shock but the doomsayers are wrong again

NASA was right in it's trajectory so we now know they're competent right?

We can now rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO isn't going to hit, right?

So now the doomsayers can calm down and rely on NASA's expertise for real, scientific answers, right? Hurah !!!

And the doomsayers can rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO is going to hit, right?

Of course it does as long as hard science can be overridden by uneducated, unfounded opinions

external image

Go to the bottom of the page and look up the time frame that i posted this at.

Well what would Fox News do if we made that a crime.

thank God we are all still here..... or should i thank the Lockheed Martians for sending Bruce Willis up to deflect the bad ass rock.

Hi guys I know this is a bit of a late add-on

I have just been flicking through my favourites and came across the NEO close approach page... neo.jpl.nasa.gov...

Now on there, is (2008 CT1) 2008-Feb-05 0.0009 0.3 8.2 m - 18 m 13.98

Is the 0.3 miss distance LD not closer than TU24 was?

This was yesterday by the way, so no need to fret now!

Sorry if I'm wrong, I'm very new to all this stuff, and didnt want to create a new thread in case I'm totally wrong

Julie

reply to post by ceekay

---

Yes, it was much closer, near 5 times close, but it was also much smaller, something like 20 times smaller.

And it was discovered on 2008-02-03.

But don't worry, it will hit us sometime in the future.

But it is too small to reach the Earth's surface, it will break up in the atmosphere.

reply to post by judasfish

---

This tractor beam is of interest.
Reportedly carrying off cattle.

I now assume the saucer is a static electricity devise.
Surrounded by positive ions and pulled up by a beam of electrons.
Well sort of along those lines.

If electrons are lifting up the positive saucer, then the cattle must be
negatively charged to be lifted up to the saucer.

So beam down some electrons on the cattle.

Never thought I'd ever be talking about beams, all that Tesla
beams I thought was hooey.

It only takes ONE accurate hit

Cover the asteroid with positive ions and move it out
like a UFO.

I had wondered if Tesla had been successful with his tower,
many more would be built and the possibility of moving the
earth out of its orbit might be possible.

Who is going to steer this thing, Bush.

Recall Immanuel Velikovsky's planetary lightning discharges and
Alfen's electrical universe and Tesla's gaseous ether that align with
the bar magnet to create the lines of force.

So what has happened that changed your mind?

reply to post by zorgon

---

JJ Thompson and Tesla theories in electric tubes of force around
charged bodies.

If great enough perhaps it works.
And Tesla did have the devices to do it.

The ol' flat coil with multiple turns as a primary ups the voltage but
one terminal is on the primary and the other is open. No current flow
but a lot of electrical stress and static charges.

The second device in center channels the electrons with a DC pulse
generator central to the craft up and away from the craft.
Thus keeping the large positive ions around the craft.

The large accumulation of positive ions surround the craft
is now part of the forces holding the craft and allowing
momentum according to JJ Thompson and Tesla (which gave
only suspension mentions and speed predictions but we know
his devices and see how static is generated).

All there is now is to watch the ignominious sparky and cloaked craft
and wonder if its right or for some to go out and build.

Might as well move on to easier conquests.

When using the Orbit Diagram I see that in December 1902 and January 1903 the asteroid was very close to us. December 13th was when it was the closest to us. Do we have any date on anomalies for that period? Did no (amateur) astronomer see it? Sorry if somebody else already posted this, but I have no time to plough trough al these pages of replies

In the mean while I'll see if I can get any more info on 13th December 1902. And see if we have been very close to the asteroid after this date.

Posted twice, sorry

[edit on 7-4-2008 by QueenofWeird]

Oops....I saw that it passed us really very very close by on 28th January 2008....and nothing indeed has happened. Well there is a photo I saw here in the thread, at least that is something :up I guess that the object is too small to have any kind of influence

The Red Planet Nibiru
www.crystalinks.com...

Yeah that is true. From Movies and Games we think its gong too be something like a Nuclear impact etc etc..but We really dont know what might happen. I'm sure if it fell into the ocean title waves will be created but a big explosion?? I don't know. I may be wrong.

Click here for more information.