Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Asteroid 2007 TU24 has NASA concerned.

page: 107
130
<< 104  105  106    108 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 31 2008 @ 11:18 PM
link   
reply to post by scrapple
 

Thanks, Scrapple!
I appreciate the link to the other thread! How very interesting!

Doyder




posted on Jan, 31 2008 @ 11:23 PM
link   
reply to post by nightmoon11
 


That is a really amazing picture. The magnetosphere is going crazy.

I think this has more to do with sunspots than NEOs. Then again I'm not a scientist so I can't be certain.

Any magnetosphere buffs care to enlighten us on the reason it could be all lit up?



posted on Feb, 2 2008 @ 12:54 PM
link   
I know this comes as a shock but the doomsayers are wrong again


NASA was right in it's trajectory so we now know they're competent right?

We can now rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO isn't going to hit, right?

So now the doomsayers can calm down and rely on NASA's expertise for real, scientific answers, right? Hurah !!!



posted on Feb, 2 2008 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
We can now rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO isn't going to hit, right?
And the doomsayers can rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO is going to hit, right?



posted on Feb, 2 2008 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by jfj123
We can now rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO isn't going to hit, right?
And the doomsayers can rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO is going to hit, right?


Of course it does as long as hard science can be overridden by uneducated, unfounded opinions



posted on Feb, 3 2008 @ 01:37 AM
link   


Go to the bottom of the page and look up the time frame that i posted this at.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 07:04 AM
link   

Of course it does as long as hard science can be overridden by uneducated, unfounded opinions



Well what would Fox News do if we made that a crime.

thank God we are all still here..... or should i thank the Lockheed Martians for sending Bruce Willis up to deflect the bad ass rock.



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 02:38 PM
link   
Hi guys I know this is a bit of a late add-on

I have just been flicking through my favourites and came across the NEO close approach page... neo.jpl.nasa.gov...

Now on there, is (2008 CT1) 2008-Feb-05 0.0009 0.3 8.2 m - 18 m 13.98

Is the 0.3 miss distance LD not closer than TU24 was?

This was yesterday by the way, so no need to fret now!

Sorry if I'm wrong, I'm very new to all this stuff, and didnt want to create a new thread in case I'm totally wrong


Julie



posted on Feb, 6 2008 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by ceekay
 


Yes, it was much closer, near 5 times close, but it was also much smaller, something like 20 times smaller.

And it was discovered on 2008-02-03.

But don't worry, it will hit us sometime in the future.


But it is too small to reach the Earth's surface, it will break up in the atmosphere.



posted on Mar, 19 2008 @ 09:43 AM
link   
reply to post by judasfish
 


This tractor beam is of interest.
Reportedly carrying off cattle.

I now assume the saucer is a static electricity devise.
Surrounded by positive ions and pulled up by a beam of electrons.
Well sort of along those lines.

If electrons are lifting up the positive saucer, then the cattle must be
negatively charged to be lifted up to the saucer.

So beam down some electrons on the cattle.

Never thought I'd ever be talking about beams, all that Tesla
beams I thought was hooey.



posted on Mar, 19 2008 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaPAnd the doomsayers can rely on their honesty and competence in the future when they say the next NEO is going to hit, right?


It only takes ONE accurate hit



posted on Mar, 19 2008 @ 01:11 PM
link   
Cover the asteroid with positive ions and move it out
like a UFO.

I had wondered if Tesla had been successful with his tower,
many more would be built and the possibility of moving the
earth out of its orbit might be possible.

Who is going to steer this thing, Bush.

Recall Immanuel Velikovsky's planetary lightning discharges and
Alfen's electrical universe and Tesla's gaseous ether that align with
the bar magnet to create the lines of force.



posted on Mar, 19 2008 @ 02:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne

Never thought I'd ever be talking about beams, all that Tesla
beams I thought was hooey.


So what has happened that changed your mind?



posted on Mar, 19 2008 @ 08:27 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


JJ Thompson and Tesla theories in electric tubes of force around
charged bodies.

If great enough perhaps it works.
And Tesla did have the devices to do it.

The ol' flat coil with multiple turns as a primary ups the voltage but
one terminal is on the primary and the other is open. No current flow
but a lot of electrical stress and static charges.

The second device in center channels the electrons with a DC pulse
generator central to the craft up and away from the craft.
Thus keeping the large positive ions around the craft.

The large accumulation of positive ions surround the craft
is now part of the forces holding the craft and allowing
momentum according to JJ Thompson and Tesla (which gave
only suspension mentions and speed predictions but we know
his devices and see how static is generated).

All there is now is to watch the ignominious sparky and cloaked craft
and wonder if its right or for some to go out and build.

Might as well move on to easier conquests.



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:04 AM
link   
When using the Orbit Diagram I see that in December 1902 and January 1903 the asteroid was very close to us. December 13th was when it was the closest to us. Do we have any date on anomalies for that period? Did no (amateur) astronomer see it? Sorry if somebody else already posted this, but I have no time to plough trough al these pages of replies


In the mean while I'll see if I can get any more info on 13th December 1902. And see if we have been very close to the asteroid after this date.



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:14 AM
link   
Posted twice, sorry


[edit on 7-4-2008 by QueenofWeird]



posted on Apr, 7 2008 @ 06:14 AM
link   
Oops....I saw that it passed us really very very close by on 28th January 2008....and nothing indeed has happened. Well there is a photo I saw here in the thread, at least that is something :up I guess that the object is too small to have any kind of influence



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 01:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by mungodave
reply to post by TheoOne
 


Well that makes me feel better


And no-one is talkin bout this in light of planet X I suppose

Im not liking this at all eh



The Red Planet Nibiru
www.crystalinks.com...



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 01:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by GioTheGreek
What type of an impact would this asteroid have if it did hit the earth?

I realise that it's roughly twice the size of sears tower, and if it did break up to a certain extent in the atmosphere, something this big would still make an impact.

Would we see a massive Tsunami if it hit water?

Would we see changes in our global climate?

I'm just trying to gauge how worried I should be about this...




Yeah that is true. From Movies and Games we think its gong too be something like a Nuclear impact etc etc..but We really dont know what might happen. I'm sure if it fell into the ocean title waves will be created but a big explosion?? I don't know. I may be wrong.



posted on Jun, 19 2008 @ 10:57 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.





new topics

top topics



 
130
<< 104  105  106    108 >>

log in

join