It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by talisman
#1. IF the collapse of the TOWERS caused the damage to WTC-7. Where's the damage to the NORTH TOWER from the SOUTH TOWER when the SOUTH TOWER collapsed?
#1. IF the collapse of the TOWERS caused the damage to WTC-7. Where's the damage to the NORTH TOWER from the SOUTH TOWER when the SOUTH TOWER collapsed?
'The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7,' NIST's Sunder tells PM. 'On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately 10 stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out.'NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner."
Originally posted by OrionStars
Please keep in mind WTC 7 was still standing hours after 1 and 2 were demolished in 10 seconds or less. Had either top fallen on WTC 7, that building would not have been standing hours later, until it was pulled by the order of Silverstein.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Yes, Silverstein had the authority to order WTC 7 pulle. He owned it.
Originally posted by Retikx
Please tell me how it could possibly make sense for EJECTED debris 68 stories higher then wtc7 to do almost no damage to the roof but somehow take a 25% scoop out of the buildings 38'ish floor?