Originally posted by doctormcauley
The people asking for names are doing this thread a disfavor. They already Know that the mods will edit any post that does this and leave behind an
edit tag saying something along the lines of "we can't have you starting a witch hunt"
This is suspicious behavior. Sadly, I won't be giving names... because I CAN'T.
And yet, I feel that is the very purpose of calling someone a disinfo agent, to start a witch-hunt, to cast doubt on everything a member does, and to
insulate yourself from having your beliefs and claims challenged. It is an attempt to derail the conversation when the weak-minded are unable to
defend their claims. It is arrogant and immature to assume someone cannot have a legitimate or reasonable disagreement without being a disinformation
agent.
And saying you cannot give names is, frankly, a cop-out. Otherwise, you would have to defend your claims, for which there is typically no proof for
other than you have a nasty disagreement with someone. I find it quite suspicious that members have no problem calling someone a disinfo-agent during
a discussion, but during a thread about that very subject, those members are scared to name names.
