It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by musselwhite
one good point about this pissing contest is you gets points. ha! ha! ha! always a positive to a negative. right?
Above a certain point-count there´s not much you can buy with your points. Hope they offer some more stuff in their points shop soon.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Talk about "rubbing it in". Typical pseudoskeptic-standard. The opponent makes one mistake, apologizes for it, but he will continue to point it out again and again.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
And now you are baiting me to elaborate on CatHerder even more. Nice try.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by SaviorComplex
To visit a website dedicated to Topic X not to chat about topic X, not to open a thread about topic X but onlyto discredit topic X and those who talk about topic X.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
I want to make sure this does not happen again.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by SaviorComplex
What I had in mind when I opened this thread is the following scenario:
An enthusiastic but naive poster opens a thread on any given alternative subject...lets say UFOs.
Originally posted by tep200377
Ok, now my turn ..
1. Tinhat A presents conspiracy theory, attempts to discuss.
2. Skeptic A walks in, asks how he got to this conspiracy conclusion.
3. Tinhat A answer a question that hasn't been asked.
etc. etc.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
A true skeptic can question, debunk and refute things without resorting to bizzare generalizations, weird tactics and personal attacks. Its as simple as that.
In fact, most of the "believers" on this thread have been skeptics towards one topic or another at one time.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
Originally posted by tep200377
Ok, now my turn ..
1. Tinhat A presents conspiracy theory, attempts to discuss.
2. Skeptic A walks in, asks how he got to this conspiracy conclusion.
3. Tinhat A answer a question that hasn't been asked.
etc. etc.
I'm sorry, I stopped reading after you used the term 'Tinhat' to describe OP's who start threads.
You pseudo-skeptics exagerate things to such a proportion that I can't even take you seriously anymore
Yes, all conspiracy theories MUST be the product of Tinhats! Despite the fact that numerous are corroborated by EXPERT opinion from government officials, scientists etc.
Seriously, why pigeonhole an entire discussion right off the bat by going in with the 'anti-tinhat' mindset? That is the DEFINITION of abiased and unscientific approach.
Again, I must say, "Yawn" and point out that conspiracy discussion is for the OPEN MINDED.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
awesome rawsom. Qualified or indoctrinated in this particular method?
Are you saying that those who do not apply "the scientific method" have below average intelligence?