This topic is in the Area 51 and other Facilities discussion forum.  (rss)


Pine Gap Underground Entry?


<<  18    19    20    21    22    23    24  >>



reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 05:16 AM by DogHead


reply to post by Zelong



Zelong- "the winner!"

I have no comment to make on that other than the above, and that will presumably get me in the [Mod Edit] but too bad. It's been a long week.





[Mod Edit: Please see ABOUT ATS: Vulgarity and The Automatic ATS Censors. Thank you - Jak]

[edit on 15/2/08 by JAK]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 06:59 AM by Zelong



Originally posted by DogHead
1. a giant soul catcher on the Moon?

This doesn't sound that far fetched to me!

Ok now this is where it gets scary and I may sound a bit out there.
Thinking alone lines of Tesla a coil.
Now the human Body has what Christians call a soul.
I call the soul an Energy source for the electrical source we have in our body's.
Now after death what happens to this Soul/Energy source
I have had this idea for over a 15yrs now,maybe this source can be used to energizes these alien craft.
Hence humans are being Farmed for this free energy to fuel these craft
Christians talk of a place called Hell were there's firer and thousands of people screaming.
Could hell be the bowels of an alien craft

DogHead have you ever thought alone these lines
Regards
Zelong.

EDIT: my post looks like one big quote I couldn't change it.

[edit on 15/2/08 by Zelong]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 07:46 AM by ArMaP



Originally posted by DogHead
[SNIP]
You should have not written that.

I know that that expression may be used by many people as if it was something funny, but it isn't, it's just a show of ignorance from those that say it.


[edit on 15-2-2008 by elevatedone]

[edit on 15/2/2008 by ArMaP]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 09:03 AM by Matyas


Truth be told, some of the claims I have made would warrant emergency funding based upon the veracity of DH's claims.

Nothing is forthcoming. DH is part of what I call organized hoaxing, and is no longer worth my time, or anyone else's here that is interested in getting closer to the truth.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 09:06 AM by DogHead


Whatever- I'm done with this thread. People can U2U me or whatever if they want to know anything. It's late, I have work to do... I'm done with the thread.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 11:16 AM by sputniksteve


reply to post by DogHead



Even if your not reading this thread anymore, I think your pretty much toast on ATS my friend. You look very suspicious now, thanks to the hard work of our fellow ATS'ers. Thanks for the fun while it lasted, keep your nose clean. Cheers!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-2-2008 @ 01:55 AM by Malynn


Ok, I'll play along:

The big Tesla coil or whatever that recharges the spaceships. Would that be what the Australian government witnesses saw as described by Whitley Streiber in the article linked earlier in this thread? Recharging the copper-tops?

[edit on 2/16/08 by Malynn]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-2-2008 @ 01:59 AM by Malynn


Well, I guess I ought to have finished reading the last few posts before I played along. Maybe I should read my own sig. Ah well, I guess I'll have to go read the other threads to find out why he's "toast" now. Although, if he is toast it's kind of fitting considering how he treated Mr. Lear. I enjoyed reading his posts, either way.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-2-2008 @ 09:46 AM by Zelong


Malynn so stay around bugger Dogshead if he/she goes so be it. I'm asking real questions here.
I've known about this stuff from years ago it's old stuff.
Yes same stuff I guess
I.m here for my self I have to find out for my self.
Im an Aussie and right now Im on VB's
I can not wright on this at the moment. .



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2008 @ 01:53 AM by Shar_Chi


Doghead got banned. Would be nice for someone at ATS to let us know, and maybe even why?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2008 @ 02:47 AM by desertfae



Originally posted by Shar_Chi
Doghead got banned. Would be nice for someone at ATS to let us know, and maybe even why?

I'd like to know as well.
He had written in a post about the Johnny Gosch kidnapping standing up for an author.. I'm not sure if that had something to do with the ban or not. He also stood up for me in my thread about the octopus.
So please ATS, enlighten us as to why DogHead was banned.
Rachel aka desertfae



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2008 @ 03:31 AM by Matyas



Originally posted by desertfae
He had written in a post about the Johnny Gosch kidnapping standing up for an author.. I'm not sure if that had something to do with the ban or not. He also stood up for me in my thread about the octopus.
So please ATS, enlighten us as to why DogHead was banned.
Rachel aka desertfae


Well, I am not ATS, but could it be because of this in KTK's post?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

And mind you, DH had a lot of our best fooled. To one degree or another. It is easy to show knowledge in this or that subject by being quick enough to mine what you know. Intelligent people are quick learners, and learning is done naturally by copying. But copying to deceive, now there is false prophesy.

And furthermore, IMHO, one should never put on the mantle of a god without the mind of one, or else be prepared to face consequences at the hand of the Old Ones for irreverence.

So it may be the end of a chapter for us, but alas, it is not for DH.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2008 @ 08:15 AM by fingapointa


It's funny how his posting died down around the time that school went back, down under. Hmmm.

As to him getting banned, I don't know and I doubt you'll get an official answer, but the simple reason is, he violated the T&C of the site. Maybe it was his advocating assassination a few pages back, maybe it was because he was in cahoots with known hoaxers/flakes in an attempt to hijack traffic to their sites.
Maybe it was because he was a ....

As for his credibility, ZERO. He provided, NOTHING. Give 'em enough rope. . .



Sorry to mungodave for the massive thread hijack. Did we ever get an answer on the underground entry?

[edit on 18-2-2008 by fingapointa]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2008 @ 08:32 AM by Shar_Chi



Originally posted by fingapointa
Sorry to mungodave for the massive thread hijack. Did we ever get an answer on the underground entry?


LOL it was a guard post, of course



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2008 @ 05:36 PM by KTK


I think it was the post in the "Im being censored thread".


ATS has some bizarro T&Cs, anything you post on here becomes the intellectual property of above networks. Even this pissy little post belongs to ats. The posts in that thread could be seen as traffic diversion and IP stealing. Thats my take on the whys, the banning took place after that post.

If you follow the link in that thread(if it still exists) you will find a place to get your dog head fix.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 04:16 AM by mungodave



Originally posted by Shar_Chi

Originally posted by fingapointa
Sorry to mungodave for the massive thread hijack. Did we ever get an answer on the underground entry?


LOL it was a guard post, of course



LMAO......... I get it..............
No.. the question wasn't answered.
But really.......... should I ask a third time?

DH reincarnate might be watching

Anyways it was worth an ask I thought.

Cheers to all that took it serious

Mungo



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 04:43 AM by Shar_Chi


Well if u dont think its a guard post and considering it is is a mere few metres on the other side of the perimeter fence, why dont u go take a photo?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-2-2008 @ 04:50 AM by mungodave


reply to post by Shar_Chi



Lmao......... i thought u were takin the piss

It looks like a tunnel entrance to me...such as all the train tunnels I have seen.
the fact that someone has taken the time to try and diffuse the pic makes me think it isn't s pose to be seen........ also the fact that it was NOT there with the previous version of Google Earth.....I guess we have come full circle.

Cheers

Mungo

And take a picture? I'll have to find my cams lol

[edit on 19/2/2008 by mungodave]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-2-2008 @ 08:22 AM by justsomeaussie


Here is a quick 101 for dodgy/bluff posts.

1 . Someone who describes how they are part of a specialist/secret organisation.

2. Someone who describes what appears to be sensitive information but will not go into details.

3. Someone who slowly reveals information they previously said they couldn't.

4. Information from said person becomes more and more inaccurate, wild, inconclusive or speculative and inconsistent.


I think the above points can all be applied to the posts of doghead and others who post similar things. It's quite easy to see every post a person has made and spot the differences as times goes on. People like this, generally just like attention and like feeling as if they are special, so in order for things to continue their posts contain more and more outrageous ideas, as has happened with this thread.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-2-2008 @ 04:11 PM by zorgon



Originally posted by mungodave
And take a picture? I'll have to find my cams lol



Probably NOT a good Idea considering the current news case of the "Pine Gap 4"

DEFENCE (SPECIAL UNDERTAKINGS) ACT 1952

Unlawful entry - section 9(1) A person is guilty of an offence if:
(a) the person is in, enters or flies over an area; and
(b) the area is a prohibited area.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 7 years

Use of cameras etc.- section 17(1) A person is guilty of an offence if:
(a) the person is in or is passing over a prohibited area; and
(b) the person has in his or her possession, carries or uses a camera or other photographic apparatus or material.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.

They did manage to get one cool picture though...

image source: http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/uploads/pine_gap_domes_ps_thumb.jpg


Cherish it... this one cost 4 people 7 years in the slammer



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  18    19    20    21    22    23    24  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 1.023 seconds
Page processed in 0.242 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread