It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OrionStars
The key to knowing they were not hollow tubes in tubes is to look at the blueprints I have linked in at least a couple of times. Those buildings definitely look internally unfinished when they took those photographs.
I have no idea why there is such concentration on bolted joint welds. What is the relevant purpose of including it as part of any reason for buildings imploding?
Originally posted by gottago
reply to post by Griff
I assume you're referring to the sunset shot showing the skeleton of the towers with the core.
That had to have been taken after construction topped out but before the exterior cladding/windows had been applied high enough on the facades to block the open views through the floors.
Originally posted by gottago
Well, Richard Ginzu came in with his welds theory re: the core columns and the thread went off in that direction, questioning for pages their integrity, only to circle back at the end to the presumption, after much sound and fury, that the welds were to spec, which translates to: they were as strong as the columns themselves.
No one has given any reasonable explanation as to why the towers continued to fall without the requisite building mass falling upon the remaining portions, though this was the point of the thread.
That's about where we are right now, hope it makes some sense.
In all honesty, you had to be there.
[edit on 24-1-2008 by gottago]
Originally posted by OrionStars
I have had the experiences of seeing seasoned people look at something and know it is not right. It could be the color. It could the consistency. It could be anything. And when tested, they were right simply by viewing it. It is called experience gained working with physical matter.
Originally posted by Richard Gizinu
To be clear, I never came in with any theory...And, you've got the conclusion all wrong.
The buildings continued to fall because the trusses were held on by 5/8" bolts, and were easily broken when all that mass fell onto the floors. The core columns held for a few seconds more, in one case 30-40 stories worth, after the floors stripped off. But the stripping off of the floors removed some the bracing for the cores. And as you mentioned some of the horizontal (longitudinal) braces were stripped off also. So the 300'+ columns were unsupported and swaying around. Then the welds broke, resuting in the columns that were asked about where I came in.
So you're okay that at the end of the collapses, you would expect to find computer components, wiring, copper pipes, etc. being pulverized to the point that the USGS can scoop them up as particulate from sites across lower Manhattan and do spectroscopic analysis of them?
Construction: Silicon dioxide or silica in the form of sand and clay is an important ingredient of concrete and brick and is also used to produce Portland cement.
Glass: Silica from sand is a principal component of glass. Glass can be made into a great variety of shapes and with many different physical properties. Silica is used as a base material to make window glass, containers, insulators, and many other useful objects.
Abrasives: Silicon carbide is one of the most important abrasives.
Both photos posted are well into the collapse, a bit less than halfway. But I'm trying to understand the relevance of your argument: how is hitting the ground going to turn the aforementioned metals and building components into fine particulate? You could take that copper pipe or wire and drop it from the height of the WTC towers repeatedly, until the end of time, and you will not turn it to particulate.
Yes, you are correct about that. Silver, copper or yttrium, however, are not.
yttrium is common in rare-earth minerals and two of its compounds are used to make the red color phosphors in cathode ray tube displays, such as those used for televisions
For example, printed circuits are made using silver paints and computer keyboards use silver electrical contacts. Some high-end audio hardware (DACs, preamplifiers, etc.) are fully silver-wired, which is believed to cause the least loss of quality in the signal. Silver cadmium oxide is used in high voltage contacts because it can withstand arcing.
Mirrors which need superior reflectivity for visible light are made with silver as the reflecting material in a process called silvering, though common mirrors are backed with aluminium. Using a process called sputtering, silver (and sometimes gold) can be applied to glass at various thicknesses, allowing different amounts of light to penetrate. This is most often seen in architectural glass and tinted windows on vehicles.
Or no medical kits?
Silver is widely used in topical gels and impregnated into bandages because of its wide-spectrum antimicrobial activity.
It occurs to me the thrust of your argument doubts the buildings even fell down at all. Demolition Charge or otherwise.
Oh and a side note, PLEASE drop the confrontational ad hominium BS.
I am not attacking you.
I am questioning your theory if you can't handle that then you really got to ask yourself why.
After all if I wanted to call you stupid I would just do it.
Waste of time to beat around the bush.
If that's what you want to believe, hey, go ahead.
****all info I used is readily found on wikipedia.com****
[edit on 25-1-2008 by WraothAscendant]
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
(Much discussion of various elements appearing in various furnishings that were likely in the towers before they fell)
It occurs to me the thrust of your argument doubts the buildings even fell down at all. Demolition Charge or otherwise.
Oh and a side note, PLEASE drop the confrontational ad hominium BS.
I am not attacking you.
I am questioning your theory if you can't handle that then you really got to ask yourself why.
After all if I wanted to call you stupid I would just do it.
Waste of time to beat around the bush.
Here are the fallacies you are spewing itemized.
The mechanical processes of the collapse will not turn them into particulate fine enough to waft across Manhattan. That is the point.
Well, don't expect a bouquet of flowers with an attitude like that. You get what you pay for.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Like I said in that post.
Add into the picture of tons (read VERY heavy) of highly abrasive concrete in motion along with the rest.
Friction is the resistive force acting between bodies that tends to oppose and damp out motion. Friction is usually distinguished as being either static friction (the frictional force opposing placing a body at rest into motion) and kinetic friction (the frictional force tending to slow a body in motion). In general, static friction is greater than kinetic friction.
The force due to kinetic friction is generally proportional to the applied force, so "a coefficient of kinetic fiction" is defined as the ratio of frictional force to the normal force on the body.
The study of friction is called tribology.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
The mechanical processes of the collapse will not turn them into particulate fine enough to waft across Manhattan. That is the point.
Like I said in that post.
Add into the picture of tons (read VERY heavy) of highly abrasive concrete in motion along with the rest.
Based on the logic you are using do you realise the amount of explosives that would have to be set up to make all the dust?
Seeing as to how you contend that there is no way it could have happend in the collapse.
Oh and the alot of the stuff I listed, easily pulverized.
Well, don't expect a bouquet of flowers with an attitude like that. You get what you pay for.
They are fallacies (as I have been working on showing you) and you are spewing them. Not an attack on you.
Descriptive terms my friend. How you chose to take them is beyond my control.