It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3_Libras
No, Im not saying its ok. But to come out and bash the Iranian President for saying that Bush is confrontational, mesmerizes my mind to no end.
What you are saying, is that he has no right to criticize Bush about provoking and whatnot, yet Bush can do the same on a daily basis? Your patriotism really makes me sick in the stomach.
Originally posted by bakednutz
Iran president says Bush confrontational
Originally posted by bakednutz
Originally posted by 3_Libras
No, Im not saying its ok. But to come out and bash the Iranian President for saying that Bush is confrontational, mesmerizes my mind to no end.
What you are saying, is that he has no right to criticize Bush about provoking and whatnot, yet Bush can do the same on a daily basis? Your patriotism really makes me sick in the stomach.
I dont think anyone on this thread has said Iran has no right to criticize Bush. He has every right to do so. But at the same time The Iranian prez has been very confrontational as well. If you dont see that, let me know I will find some quotes and some proof that he is.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
M He could have easily gone a different route to get nuclear power for his country and even get it free, but he didn’t because he needed to defy the US.
Every hero needs a villain and the president of Iran is a political person who wants to be the hero of the Iranian people against the evil Americans for the simple reason of personal politics.
It’s that simple, and the US will not attack unless Iran invades another country in some way or launches their 10,000 rockets. It is all BS and the president in Iran is playing the people there like a violin.
Originally posted by bakednutz
I agree with some of this. But not parts like just going nuclear to defy the US. Where could he get that for Free? I do believe there is a desire their to attain nuclear weapons as well as nuclear power but not just to defy the west but because they want these things.
I also believe we would go to war for more reasons than you state. How about if Israel decided to launch an attack against Iran? We would surely aid in that effort. Or if they continue to taunt the US navy and there is an incident? The list goes on....
Originally posted by Xtrozero
As part of the deal they were offered light water reactors built by France I believe for basically free as long as they didn't pursue the course they are on now. With light water reactors you cannot also make nukes.
Israel is not a threat to them unless Iran by design becomes a threat to Israel. Iran could have easily gone in the direction of Egypt or Jordan with Israel. Nukes are a major threat to Israel for it would only take one or two to basically wipe them off the map.
The only way we would go to war would be because they did a major strike on the US in some way or they invaded another country. The US doesn't not want war with them for it would be another trillion dollar ticket for nothing.
Lets me ask you this, if Iran was not saber rattling who would they need 10,000 rocks against? There isn’t anyone who wants to do anything to them but buy their oil.
Originally posted by bakednutz
Because both he and Israel would love to do a lot more to Iran than just buy their oil, like steal it by taking over the country!
Originally posted by bakednutz
I was actually joking about stealing the oil. But Bush and Israel would love a war with Iran, there is no denying that.