UFO recorded on video by Fox Photographer, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 03:06 PM by defuntion
reply to post by SimonSays



The station reported the incident to the FBI, and then they got invovled...

Though, still, you are right why are they bothering to interview this guy about a "UFO" if they are out of that business (since 1969)?

Their interest may be because this "UFO" was so close to an airport?

Whatever the reason, I found the video very interesting. I have no good explanation for what that object could have been, but it had to have been very high, and going very fast.

It almost looked like a missle, but based on how high the object was it would have been too large to be a missle..

I'm stumped.

Cool find. I've never seen this one before.

[edit on 17-1-2008 by defuntion]



reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 03:37 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by jritzmann



Jeff, since you are the expert on these things, I'll accept that explanation as the most probable cause and the most likely explanation. Case closed on the object but, the interesting aspect of this story is, as Simon Says said (heh), if the gov't doesn't investigte UFOs, why did the FBI hook this guy up to a lie detector? Hell, why did they bother responding to the call? The only explanation could be that he said he had a video of a plane taking off from an airport and what appeared to be a missile flying across the video. So the feds check it out. Ok, let's assume that's the reasoning behind the willingness to investigate this. Wouldn't they know if a missile was fired? If it wasn't one of ours, it would someone else's and that would have been picked up on radar so that would rule out someone else's missile (that and the lack of detonation or landing). So, they hear there is a video of a possible missile at an airport, they know there were no missiles on radar, that means the object is unexplained. It was flying. It is an unidentified flying object. And they show up to investigate when they officially don't do that.

odd behavior indeed.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 03:57 PM by IAttackPeople
reply to post by Crakeur



First: It's a bug.

Second: In regards to your question, Crackeur; in Post-9/11 America a guy hanging-around an airport filming aircraft and catching a "missile" on tape might warrant investigation.

And who says, "The US doesn't investigate UFO claims" anyway? Bogus statement. At the very least, the FAA will investigate if they feel that air safety may be at risk. See the 2007 O'Hare sighting investigation, for example.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 04:14 PM by Crakeur
Originally posted by IAttackPeople
And who says, "The US doesn't investigate UFO claims" anyway? Bogus statement.


the air force, that's who:
www.af.mil...
The decision to discontinue UFO investigations was based on an evaluation of a report prepared by the University of Colorado entitled, "Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects;" a review of the University of Colorado's report by the National Academy of Sciences; previous UFO studies and Air Force experience investigating UFO reports during 1940 to 1969.


and
Since the termination of Project Blue Book, nothing has occurred that would support a resumption of UFO investigations by the Air Force. Given the current environment of steadily decreasing defense budgets, it is unlikely the Air Force would become involved in such a costly project in the foreseeable future.


and lastly

Persons wishing to report UFO sightings should be advised to contact local law enforcement agencies


It is their public stance. Hasn't changed since 1969. Or so they want us to believe.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 04:32 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by IAttackPeople



I think you missed my sarcasm. What I was pointing out in the original post you referenced was that they do investigate ufos, they just say they don't. By admitting they investigate, they admit they (ufos) exits. They are then put in the precarious position of implying that the gov't feels there might be something beyond this rock. They cannot do this. They are afraid to do this. They are doing it, they just don't admit to it. When you get a story like this, it further proves they are lying to us about investigating ufos. once you can prove, undeniably, that they are lying about this, you can get them to disclose some truth.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 04:33 PM by SimonSays
reply to post by Mondogiwa


well I hate to disagree with a professional pilot

but every missile I've ever seen emits a smoke trail
or an exhaust. There is no trail in that video.

So I'm gonna have to disagree with the missile theory.

And the bug theory don't make much sense to me either
as wings would be flapping in 7 still shots. Those wings
(flaps) are stationary in all 7 still shots. So I can rule out
the bug theory as well.

This case is not closed in my honest opinion. Unless somebody
else has got some other suggestions. No offense



reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 04:57 PM by Shades1035
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to
post by jritzmann



Jeff, since you are the expert on these things, I'll accept that explanation as the most probable cause and the most likely explanation. Case closed on the object




How can you say case closed just because some guy thinks its an insect? The reporter said the object went over the clouds, guess you must have missed that part?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 6 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 14 days ago with 60 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 18 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 9 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags