Voters Choice for Top Threads?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 01:05 PM by budski
The only downside IMO, is the "fluff" threads like the one about porn filters, and the hoax threads - whether known or unknown by the author, like this one

I'm not saying the author knew it was a load of rubbish, but many UK members posted saying there was no truth to the story, yet it ran and ran.

It may also lead to creation of sensationalist unprovable claims in the very popular ufo forum - you know the type of thing.

If there could be a way of weeding out some of these then I'm all for it.




reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 01:18 PM by TheDuckster
reply to post by budski



This is where the 'voting' comes in my good friend.

General Consensus.

Above that, do you think my proposal is a good idea?

~Ducky~


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 02:25 PM by TheDuckster
reply to post by TheoOne



Hence the reason for bringing up the subject in this particular format.

~Ducky~


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 02:32 PM by TheDuckster
reply to post by Sauron



Not so much the WATS award.

I'm looking at something that is 'merited down the road'. Weekly? Mabey more feasible with 'Monthly' (where tabulation is concerned).

An 'Accumulation' of votes for a set period of time. A 'build-up' of some sorts; awarded to 'BEST OUTSTANDING THREAD'.

~Ducky~
Pages:     ^^TOP^^