AMERICAS UNDER ATTACK! Chemtrails over NJ, page 4

Originally posted by billybob
i don't care enough about physicality to bother trying to test anything.

What?

i think it would be a good experiment for people to test the dust in their houses. house dust content is pretty well documented. if houses in different parts of the country showed a higher concentration than testing done on house dust from ten or fifteen years ago, this would be an indicator that that's what they are SPRAYING.

A somewhat flawed method, again no control sample. There are thousands (millions?) of possible reasons for any changes over time. Probably better testing cities with high overflight rates against cities with lower rates. But even then there is a massive margin of error and problems with the method.

this would also indicate that the purpose is not to infect the population, but rather to blanket the earth in a fine pervasive dust which could be used for imaging. this will make it even easier for big brother to watch us.

What would indicate? Exactly what is going to be in this 'dust' that would make it easier for 'them' to watch us?

all kinds of particulates are already up there. the idea that they can't pass through jet engines without damamging them, ignores the fact that jet engines ALWAYS have crap going through them.

So? it really depends on what you assume 'they' are pumping out. Even regular dust that is found under normal operating conditions becomes a problem if it gets too thick.

when we talk of a difference between CHEMtrails and CONtrails, we are obviously aware that there is such a thing as a contrail. we have observed a difference. the onslaught and veracity of the 'they're just condensation' camp makes it even MORE suspicious.

Now here we have the very heart of the problem with the whole chemtrail theory. Still noone has been able to come up with a solid reason why Persistent Contrails are the fabled Chemtrails. Anecdotal crap like 'when I was younger there was less of them, or 'I got the flu after watching chemtrails' is just useless.

These trails we are seeing are indistinguishable from a perfectly normal and well understood effect of Jet engines flying in the right conditions. In conditions conducive to cloud formation, if a plane flys through and dumps a load of water vapor up there, a cloud will form.

There is no way of proving that Chemtrails do not exist, but that is less exciting than it seems. It is because 'Chemtrails' is an unprovable theory.

As well as being unable to show any reason why these trails are not just regular contrails, the chemtrail theorists also fail to give any testable theories regarding the trails. Beyond 'the government is spraying whatever for whatever reason'.

Good old Occam breaks out his razor again and relegates the chemtrails theory to the junk science bin until someone can propose some testable aspects. Or until any reason is given to doubt the proposition that they are indeed just contrails.

denying ignorance is not thinking you have all the answers. it is to keep quest-ioning.

Well yes indeed, thinking you had all the answers would be ignorant, but excessive questioning is also ignorance. To learn is denying ignorance.