100% PROOF of Controlled Demolitions @ WTC, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 03:03 PM by GUICE2
reply to post by shaneOmac



I know...i got you. I was just trying to say that as soon as people see some type of miswording like that they just dismiss the whole thing. In other words...they know something went wrong but know that what they are looking at MIGHT not be real or can be fabricated and then give up hope.


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 10:42 PM by weedwhacker
I will remain neutral about the 'controlled demolition' versus collapse from weakened support structure due to gravity debate...but I must say this:

I have seen quite a few videos of actual controlled demolitions...spectacular ones in Vegas, tenements in somewhere, Chicago or Pittsburgh or any place you care to name. They, the ones on THOSE videos had one thing in common -- it was obvious! I mean, the thing goes down in a circle, the charges go off in a rotation...all to keep the footprint small at the end, of course.

But, from the documentaries I've seen, it takes days and days, if not weeks to rig these things. Then, there are all of the wires snaked out to where the 'plunger'...well, to where the ultimate 'button' is pressed to set it all off.

NOW...someone, please, consider this...the first Tower was hit by AA11, and it was fairly higher up than where the second Tower was hit, by UA175. Roughly 10-15 minutes difference between the two hits. BUT, which Tower collapsed first? It was the Tower hit second, but down lower.

Tons and tons of structure up above, and a weakening core below. All of that weight, once it started, had a tremendous amount of potential and kinetic energy. HUGE forces were at work.

Even after all of this, and we have all seen the iconic pictures of the aftermath...there were still huge segments at street level left intact.

Someone somewhere said nothing was left larger than a few inches...obviously wrong. This is a chaotic event, and strange things can happen.

Don't forget, there was a huge multi-level basement below each Tower as well.

Lastly...please remember the difference in the speed of light and the speed of sound when comparing these events from different sources. To us, light is virtually instant. Sound, at sea level, is about 1125 fps. So, the visual and the accompanying sound will not match, depending on your distance.

AND, please remember the victims....


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 11:36 PM by Ketzer22
reply to post by billybob



Also, to say the buildings "collapsed" doesn't even describe it. They shredded, or something. It looks like a wick burning. I'm going to get a Phd in psychology and write my first peer-reviewed piece on why the average American doesn't want to face the facts of 9/11.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 05:32 AM by Beefcake
Anyone who still believes the official story at this point is either in denial or a complete fool. 9/11 was a False Flag operation to create an enemy and instill fear in the public consciousness and a plethora of other reasons.

Debate the reason for the collapse all you want but that facts are that they ran drills the same day reenacting hijacked planes going into the exact same targets that were hit by the planes. The chances of them running drills of the same events that eventually happen at the same time HAHA is laughable.

Radical Islam could not have made NORAD stand down. Building 7 wasn't even hit by a damn plane and it collapses. The tape of Osama confessing is obviously not him and every tape since has looked bogus.

How did the Muslim world benefit from 9/11. Why in the world would they attack America so intensely and claim it and say where they are. I mean now they can't find Osama but after the fact he is running around advertising where he is and essentially saying come get me but now he decides to hide? HAHA.

Do you know how they even knew the names of the highjackers, people? The names weren't on the flight manifests no they were written on a list in Atta's bag which coincidently didn't make it onto his flight but got put on a wrong flight how convenient. Then they said they identified the hijackers by DNA where did they get the original DNA to compare it too.

OMG then there is the highjacker who had his ID found not once but twice in 2 different locations and the one that made it too the ground fully intact even though it was in a plane that flew into a building. Then all the metal at the towers is friggin molten steel!!! MOLTEN STEEL. Then as the cherry on top Controlled Demolition inc does the cleanup and all the steel is sent to china a disapeared.

I swear i never even bother posting about 9/11 i'm just waiting for the NWO to expose it themselves as a final death blow to the US. The US will be brought to its knees people, that is the plan and when it is in shambles the UN will have to save them and the best suggestion to fix such systemic corruption is to disolve the US gov't and then to save the west we'll need to unite under a North American Union.

9/11 will come out and we won't be the ones to do it. Enjoy your denial because soon you won't even have free speech anymore and will be lining up at a camp for work and food like in grapes of wrath. Depression coming.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 06:23 AM by Kranil
reply to post by IvanZana



So, where's the proof again? Because all I see is a bunch of glass falling down catching the sunlight and debris being ejected from a collapsing building. None of which is very convincing evidence against the official story. Maybe I'm missing something very important in these videos, in which case I'd be open to someone explaining it to me.


reply posted on 17-1-2008 @ 06:41 AM by smans
I always wanted to know this:

When a plane hit the tower it made it collapse...so when the first tower fell with roughly 25% of it hitting the other tower, why didnt it fall then? We are talking about 169,000,000 kg of building
SOURCEand about a quarter of it hitting the other tower so roughly 42,250,000kg od steel and concrete slamming into the other building as it fell not bringing a building down, but the plane and burning fuel can. Not forgeting that these falls "supposedly" messed up building 7.

Ow wait, the plane weakened the top 11 flors, so by my calculation that equates to 16,900,000kg (lots of zeros less) having enough force to topple the 2nd tower.

Cool, looks like physics lost out on Sept 11. - Einstein woulda loved to be there.
Maybe its sitting on a hellgate and there are vampires in New York too... /sarcasm off.

Great post Ivan!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 17 hours ago, 25 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 25 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 8 hours ago, 22 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 21 flags
Amazing French Indigo Girl in Africa (Tippi)
  Survival, Posted 6 hours ago, 14 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 17 hours ago, 128 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 102 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 16 hours ago, 38 replies