when a number pops up it's to refer to how many insults have been directed towards either a specific atheist or atheists in general
Originally posted by Conspiriology
little poop stain
ought to have his butt kicked for being such a pain in the hind in.
Jeeez does this guy have anything less noble to rain on.
did you even read the source?
He was there arguing Governor Rod Blagojevich’s $1,000,000 grant to the Pilgrim Baptist Church — which was given to them via the more
secular Loop Lab School. (Shadiness all around.)
government giving religious institution money via a secular institution...hmm
kind of not noble at all
and the moment of silence isn't noble either, by the way. it's state endorsed prayer. endorsing prayer is a general endorsement of religions that
involve prayer. since not all people have a religion or practice a religion that involves prayer, this is a direct violation of the establishment
Is he that damn selfish,
that much of a pantywaisted wimp,
says the man insulting him from behind a computer screen because he has absolutely no arguments to provide.
what a JERK.
I saw that crap and thought, man Atheists are pushing thier luck.
standing up for our rights and challenging direct violations of the law of the land isn't pushing our luck, it's called not "not taking your crap
Sunday, I had never seen so many pissed off christians at church in my life.
yeah, people tend to get upset when we atheists get all uppity, don't they?
arguing for our rights, the nerve of us.
So pissed off di that little idiot succeed in doing,
he succeeded in upholding the law, you shouldn't be pissed off
...unless you think that the law should unfairly favor certain religions.
they actually told the pastor to cancel his sermon and demanded he discuss THAT vermon
and how or what we need to do to stick it to atheists.
...hooray for bigotry!
Like I said, they keep poking the bear.
again, we're just standing up for our rights. if you consider that poking the bear, i can only imagine how you view other, far more historically
important rights movements
You don't even get it, yeah she was an idiot
that's the only statement i'll agree with.
but that isn't nothing to make a stink about when you consider what that JERK was making such a big deal about.
and it's plenty to make a stink about. imagine if she was a catholic and had told a protestant that their philosophy was dangerous for children to
i'm quite sure that there'd be a huge fuss
and he wasn't being a jerk, he was asserting constitutional rights.
That guy is done.
hooray for indirect threats!
They WILL get smashed and I will be the first to say I told ya so.
so now i have a bigoted crackdown on atheists to look forward to? what fun!
Atheists will use the ACLU to make sure Gays have a right to voice their brand of sexual depravity when it's none of our business.
1: you have absolutely no proof that it's mostly atheists that are pushing for homosexual rights. i can guarantee that. there isn't anything to show
that we're the ones pushing for gay rights more than anyone else
2: everyone, and i mean everyone, has the right to free speech. if you don't like it, move to a country where there isn't free speech.
While they act like small minded little party poopers on the Christians parade,
raining on one damn minute of a moment of silence, and it looks like THAT is more what Atheists are about.
it's state sponsored prayer. if you want to debate the legal issue, we can, but i don't think that's the point of this thread.
A small group of the religiously intolerant crybabies
who talk a big game about 1st amendment rights but says religious in science has no right to that speech when it comes to Science.
...because religion has no place in science. the scientific curriculum is decided by science, not by what people's beliefs are
would you like to have astrology taught in the astronomy class?
or maybe the hindu story of creation?
how about this, mosey on over to O&C if you want to see why religion in science isn't taught (hint: because it's wrong
...oops, i just gave it
They talk smack about how Christians raise there children
ugh, not this **** again (2 notes, i've been saying that a lot lately because people keep regurgitating the same ignorant arguments and i'm self
censoring the word)
yet throw that whole idea they are even serious by advocating the deaths of millions of babies to abortion with their loose liberalism because those
babies are just animals like any lab rat.
...for some reason you love to stereotype atheists
atheists aren't all liberals. i haven't seen any numbers on it, but i haven't seen anything to show that atheists are any more liberal on average
you're also assuming that we all advocate abortion... however, we don't. there's division because we actually look at the philosophical discussion
over it. (odd note, aquinas would have been ok with abortion within the first 40 days of a pregnancy)
Like the A-sexual person so wrapped up in themselves so unattractive they have only themselves to meet the needs for gratification A-theists
are also adding the same obstacles for finding them attractive.
if being attractive means i have my rights trampled on, i'd rather be the most repulsive man in the world.
Like the A-symetrical definition, being one off balance, the A-theist shows us the same unbalanced worldveiw
...atheists don't share a single world view
where are you getting these stereotypes from?
where history has proven time and time again, they get a little power a little say in the process and the balance is left lop sided as they have tried
to exterminate the Christian
that was communism
it had nothing to do with the people being atheists. the communists would have still committed purges if they were shintoists, jews, christians,
and speak the same way now as they did the many times in the past where communism, marxism, became the signature Atheists style of Government.
...communism and marxism aren't inherently the same thing...
i'll snip out your external source
and i'll provide the date it was written:
Monday, Feb. 27, 1928
since i can't even find anything else on the organization supposedly reported on because of how archaic this is, i'll just leave it at that.
I got news for those Atheists, that THEY don't OWN Science
we never said we did, but any good scientist of any religious persuasion knows that religious issues have no place in science.
and anyone telling the truth about that bunk crap baloney called evolution is automatically black listed,
you still talk an awful game about how evolution is crap, why don't you show up on O&C anymore to actually see how wrong you are?
it isn't baloney, you just don't want to accept it. it's there, the evidence is there. if you have any problems with the theory, please try to
refute it (but go to O&C and do that, we get off topic enough here as it is)
their freedom of speech gag ordered by Atheist who say they don't think there is anything more than material worlds.
the vast majority of religious
scientists agree with evolution.
and it's not gag ordered, their speech isn't squashed. they publish materials all the time (oddly enough they never put it into journals where it
can be peer reviewed by those who accept evolutionary theory), though their materials tend to be far from scientific.
Then I'd say they don't have anything to worry about, so why not see if they don't just prove Darwin wrong?
they're given the chance. they're given ample chance.
the problem is that they can't. they have nothing to prove the theory of evolution is wrong.
Those Scientists have the same Degree's in Science as anyone of the others, but what they don't have is the limits of materialism or the idea that
their is no more to it then that.
...actually, there's plenty more to it. you're failing to realize that even the other religious scientists disagree with the creationists.
con, where's the beef? you have to show evidence when you throw out this sort of accusation.
They know evolutions "mountain" of evidence is no mountain but an ant hill
because that's Atheism dirty little secret.
no, it's a mountain
and this is just the tip of the iceberg (i know i'm mixing my metaphors here)
PS: ya now what is so ironic,, when she said "it’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists! " That is
exactly the same thing Dawkins, Harris and Hitchens says about us teaching our Christian philosophy to our kids.
really? can you prove it? nay, you can't, because you misconstruing what they said to prove your point. that, good sir, is called lying.
there are plenty of instances in which "teaching [your] Christian philosophy" is abusive...like hell houses.
I'm begining to to think she wasn't so off the mark after all. Good Job Atheists, go ahead,, post up your double standards while those same
Atheist's Justify our Bigotry towards them.
we don't have double standards and thanks for admitting that you're bigoted against atheists