apparently being ignorant and ignoring the points that dismantle your argument are enough to garner 3 stars now...
who knew?
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
Than say it. I look forward to any examples you can provide where I skew history to promote an ideology in the same manner that you folks have.
well, the age of religious wars, for one thing
you skewed it as a "evil vatican vs good protestants who are the real christians" age
...there was plenty of protestant on protestant action going on at the time.
and that whole "the catholic church isn't christian" thing, but i'll address that later.
What are you talking about? Romans were murdering Christians for sport for hundreds of years before they made Christianity a state power - the
Vatican.
Nothing to highjack? I guess all the Christians they were murdering didn't exist?
...the christians being murdered were catholics
like st. peter, the first pope
see, you're trying to fuse the roman state with the catholic church, something that only happened circa 300
Is that so? I suppose you want to ignore that the Catholic church was murdering and imprisoning people for hundreds of years eh?
...and yet that has nothing to do with the protestants starting the age of religious wars
So what? Do you understand how many terrorists do the exact same thing for Allah?
Do you consider terrorists the representatives of Islam?
Do you consider religious extremists the representatives of Christianity?
If so: you're clueless.
i never said religious extremists were the only representatives of christianity and you're deflecting with this answer
the age of religious wars was something the masses got behind, not just extremists. this was the common man, not chris crusade
'Anti-catholic'? Hardly. You may not have any desire to cope with history or the sentiment of the Christian sects, but the fact remains: the Vatican
is not Christianity.
the vatican may not be all of christianity, but it sure as hell is part of it.
in fact, the vatican and the orthodox church are the only modern churches that have any real connection to the original form of christianity, which
was most likely not based on biblical literalism, as they really didn't have a canon to work from...
but i just love it when christians say that other christians aren't christians and then state that it's a fact.