Huckabee: Amend Constitution to be in 'God's standards' , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 15-1-2008 @ 08:35 PM by Thousand
reply to post by mizzu



So basically, what you're trying to say without saying it is: "The constitution was based on the bible, but it's been relaxed over the years to make sin more 'accessible' by making acceptable 'lifestyles' and 'choices' that were not originally allowed, and now it's become 'mans' law instead of 'gods' law."

Do you even have a clue as to how completely wrong you are?

Do you know anything about the American Constitution? At all? I assume you're American, but it sure doesn't sound like you've even read the thing...because it has provisions against the exact type of changes you're hoping to have made. Biblical influence belongs nowhere in government, especially in the judicial branch.

One Nation Under God indeed.

[edit on 15/1/2008 by Thousand]


reply posted on 15-1-2008 @ 10:01 PM by HimWhoHathAnEar
reply to post by Inannamute




Hm. You know, I can't remember any country in living memory that decided that their government had a right to dictate good and bad religions to the masses... none at all..


Umm... The Middle East. Islam. China. Ring any bells?


reply posted on 15-1-2008 @ 10:07 PM by j_kalin
Originally posted by mizzu
In it's original context, the Constitution is , for the most part, in agreement with the Bible. Our founding fathers used the Ten Commandments as a basis for "man's" law. Throughout the years, the Constitution as well as corresponding state & federal laws, have been changed via amendments to reflect man's interpretation of present day trends. In other words, what the majority felt was too restrictive or condeming in the original law was changed to make their "lifestyles" or "choices" lawful. I for one, would welcome more Biblical influence in the judicial branch. "One nation Under God".


I beg to differ; the constitution was based on English common law, created by the English kings and the Magna Carta as well as other legal documents of the time. Nothing in the constitution has ever been taken directly from the 10 commandments as valid as they may be, and incorporated into our laws. Keep in mind that the founders were deists, and not necessarily Christians in the modern sense. They believed in a universal higher power, not in any particular religion. That is why they came to this continent (to escape religious persecution and government dictates on religious matters). Thus the concept of church and state separation. If Huck's ideas seem sensible to you, imagine he is a Muslim and wants to start sharia law. That's why this sort of thing is unacceptable. The constituion has to work for everyone, not just the minoruty(20% or so) who are evangelical christians.

Wikipedia:Historical influences
Several of the ideas in the Constitution were new, and a large number of ideas were drawn from the literature of Republicanism in the United States, from the experiences of the 13 states, and from the British experience with mixed government. The most important influence from the European continent was from Montesquieu, who emphasized the need to have balanced forces pushing against each other to prevent tyranny. (This in itself reflects the influence of Polybius' 2nd century BC treatise on the checks and balances of the constitution of the Roman Republic.) John Locke is known to have been a major influence, and the due process clause of the United States Constitution was partly based on common law stretching back to the Magna Carta of 1215.[9] Another leading influential force was that of the Iroquois Confederacy which had set a basis for the United States Constitution as well as the Articles of Confederation.


reply posted on 15-1-2008 @ 11:56 PM by Arcane Demesne
reply to post by Nailer



16th

deemed illegal the first rn in the 1880's, and was finally passed in 1913.


reply posted on 16-1-2008 @ 05:06 AM by dawnstar
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
reply to
post by Nailer



16th

deemed illegal the first rn in the 1880's, and was finally passed in 1913.


"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

For some reason, I don't see any biblical justification for trying to derail the 16th amendment. What was it Jesus said, oh ya, give unto Ceaser (the Fed in our case) what is Ceaser's (the fed owns the money, we just borrow it from them and then get hit with a nice interest charge).....and unto God what is God's.....in other words go fishing with the faith that God will provide you with the money you need to pay ceaser!!!
Even Jesus didn't see anything wrong with paying taxes!! Now you can argue that the fed is the money changers that Jesus drove out of the temple, but then that could be easily corrected by our government starting to print it's own money, and then collecting the fed's money from us, and giving it back to the fed, along with some of the newly printed money to make up the difference, and we could walk away without any debt. But, well, who's to say that our government would be any better at running the economy than the fed was....or that they would spend less money and cease taxation!

Na, for some reason, I don't think this is the amendment that Huckabee would like to get rid of. He wants to be president, and I am sure he would like to be paid well for being president.
The 13th maybe...the 14th probably...the 15th more than likely...the 19th most definately... and then there's the 24th..
and of course there would have to be at least one addition, the Federal Marriage Ammendment...

but there's no biblical justification to oppose taxation, although I could see a reason to oppose the way we are getting our money as being a little out of biblical bounds, since it makes us all debtors from the start. but, you don't need any changes to the constitution or the amendments to fix that one!

oh, by the way, ya so hucky messed up and let a rapist murder go......so what. it was pretty commonly known that bush was lying thru his teeth, and he managed to ride the christian right back into the white house. It must be that power or prayer....or easily manipulated electronic voting machines.!!



[edit on 16-1-2008 by dawnstar]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 190 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 83 replies