Does anyone know what establishment science concluded (if anything) about the Hobbit man that was found some time ago? I haven't heard much about
this case since the finding occurred.
Last I heard they were still arguing whether it was a diseased modern human or a human-chimpanzee link. Some evolutionists swear it was simply a
genetic physical disorder and some swear it is a missing link. This was at of the end of 2007.
Yeah, I had heard roughly the same. Thanks for responding anyway, not a topic striking too many people's fancy I guess (or maybe there's just
nothing more to know).
Nothing in terms of actual evidence has in any way controvened the original identification of a new species / subspecies of hominid. Armchair experts
have taken it upon themselves to make assertions but the existence of Homo Floriensis is unchallenged except by those with a vested interest- and no
empirical evidence of their alternative.
Reinterpreting clear data to cloud an issue is not the same thing as actually advancing a genuine alternative theory.