Last I heard they were still arguing whether it was a diseased modern human or a human-chimpanzee link. Some evolutionists swear it was simply a
genetic physical disorder and some swear it is a missing link. This was at of the end of 2007.
Nothing in terms of actual evidence has in any way controvened the original identification of a new species / subspecies of hominid. Armchair experts
have taken it upon themselves to make assertions but the existence of Homo Floriensis is unchallenged except by those with a vested interest- and no
empirical evidence of their alternative.
Reinterpreting clear data to cloud an issue is not the same thing as actually advancing a genuine alternative theory.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.