posted on Jan, 15 2008 @ 10:30 AM
I dont why everybody stirs and denies what people describe what they saw. I think that what they describe is what they saw, i know that there is a
high % that maybe they think the saw something and was something else actually but saying in a way "they are ignorant and they dont know what they
saw" for me its very bad sign from this forum. You are judging people when nobody from here saw the thing, everybody is speculation (not a bad thing
but i see lots of flaming the thing). People can make mistakes but just 1 or 2, many in the town saw the same exact thing?..well thats different. Now
i am thinking that if its not GOV aproved then all its a lie, and the people in town that saw this thing are very wrong.
Now this is sad, the GOV can say whatever they want, heck they dont want to deal with this stuff actually, thats why they will denied everything in
the UFO matter (whatever this things flying are ET, or from other dimension of some black budget military craft)
I am just kind of sick to see people just flame good reports that end up in important news stations just because "people cant see good" or is not
GOV aproved, this is not a report like fantastic things like billy mayer or jhonatan reed or that type of stuff that is more crap than true...