It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bizarre statement from Fox Debate Moderator

page: 3
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 08:47 AM
link   
Im from the UK and the first thing that spring's to my mind when i see all this is wait for it............................

AMERICAN IDOL

How sad is that ?

Wake up American's!

Regards
Lee




posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 08:53 AM
link   
I'm not going to read the rest of the comments but I'm sure somebody else with sanity has said the same thing:

He stumbles. He stutters. Nothing coherent is said. People do it all the time.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 09:53 AM
link   
This movie should be called:

Faux news owned by Dr. Paul



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 10:47 AM
link   
Maybe he is a stutterer but based on the subject about electability, he was stammering and formulating his words to get his point across effectively.

Contextually, "there way" in relation to being electable could mean he was trying to say something like "Is there any way" "Is there a way", "there a way", theraway"



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ketzer22
reply to post by Golack
 


I posted this about 10 minutes ago hehe.. but they took mine down.. but yea.. very weird indeed. Could be hinting towards the PTB and thier control over the media


Neat - I watched the debate live but missed the "their way" frog croak.

And while I am up on most of this stuff, could somebody fill me in on the PTB acronym, I get the gist but dont know its specific meaning,

Thanks - the nodding head.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:08 AM
link   
People are saying this little croak is just a mundane slip up and covered up a bit by Fox.


If it's just ordinary, why has this thread received so many flags (22 so far).


I myself think this clip is strange and how he sticks out his tongue and says something that doesn't really fit into the conversation or topic.



Flagged



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Along with my PTB reference question,

-can anyone confirm the story that when the debate was replayed on FOX immediately following this intial broadcast - FOX stripped out Paul's response to the 'their way' electability question.

Supposedly the second time around peolpe didnt get to hear the now sort of infamous , "(Paul) Let me get this straight - smackdown of modern US Foreign Policy".

Thanx,
scrap



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:28 AM
link   
If they cut this from the 2nd showing then that "slip" was intentional .

I bet they had him slip up so when they cut it they could say "oh there was a glitch there and we couldn't leave it in "

Most people would nod and say "oh gee didn't notice that sorry for asking"

Of course i could be wrong . But it seems plausible.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:32 AM
link   
I am well versed in reptiallian croakalistic linguistics , he in fact saying ' we cheated you in florida 2004 and got our reptile in , so don't think you have any chance boy.'



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:40 AM
link   
I don't think there is anything bizzare here other than a simple psychological ploy. The moderator purposefully fumbled his words try and act as if he couldn't even find the words to ask him about electability. By doing so in this fashion it makes it appear as if the moderator is so shocked by Paul being on stage with the rest that he can't even find the words to ask him an authentic question. People do this all the time. In an effort to make someone seem ridiculous they start out asking you a straighforward question and half pause and start to laugh or fumble with their words while smiling to make the very act of asking the question seem crazy and unneccessary because the person the question being directed towards isn't worth their time/reasoning/whatever.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:40 AM
link   
I am not sure that FOX cut the "their way" for the second showing.

I only read from a Paul election site that the second showing had editied or "clipped" Paul's response to that same question.

If someone has both episodes taped it would be nice to compare.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:48 AM
link   
I am more surprised Ron Paul even deemed to appear on this unworthy channel, why would anyone of repute want to be seen on a worthless propoganda outlet watched only by fools ?



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:01 PM
link   
Wait what? Reptilians? wow....are you serious? I think he was trying to hint at the fact that the system is run their way, or maybe he was just side tracked. Seriously, get off the reptilian kick, it makes people look more crazy than our own government.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:08 PM
link   
Ok everyone try and do the same thing he did. Start a question in your normal voice and switch to a very low croak and say "their way" followed by your normal voice of "do you have any sir?"

Not an easy thing to do...try it


very wierd...BTW Paul Pwned that question.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:17 PM
link   
I know it's off topic for this thread, but I gotta say...that was probably the best answer I've ever heard for a question like that.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:23 PM
link   
I heard what he said as I was able to capture the video from memory and run it through my Avaya system. He said, and I quote: "Ron, I am your faatha. Come to the Dark Side." No kidding.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Donoso
 


Stutters? Stumbles? Please, I urge you Donoso, go back and watch the video he again. He clearly says "Their Way". Now whether this is part of a conspiracy or just a simple communications mistake i'm not sure of.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:56 PM
link   
Yeah, that's weird, but Paul's racist remarks are ok w/ you guys?

I mean, you guys are cool w/ that?



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nyorai
That was kind of weird.

But Paul knows how to deal with questions like these.




Yes, defintely. he´s a real pro.
and THE ONLY ONE with right ideas and relevant concepts.

Paul for President!





posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lord XIII
Yeah, that's weird, but Paul's racist remarks are ok w/ you guys?

I mean, you guys are cool w/ that?




This is in not to say I abide open racism, but how do I know that your kid home sick today isnt writing under your name right now?



new topics




 
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join