It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

RARE VIDEO - Proof TV Blacked Out During Flight 175 Crash.

page: 2
4
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 04:24 PM
link   
reply to post by IvanZana
 


On satellite I did not have anything resembling a black out, just nothing actually witnessed, particularly on WTC 2. Not even a plane flying into impact anything. It was as if someone did a film edit before any plane could be seen, and then no visibility through all that black cloud. The film jumps like a bad edit would cause it to do. First you see it; then you do not, exactly like a magician's trick.




posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 05:25 PM
link   
my family and my extended family all watched the live feed from sky news and none of us seen a plane hit wtc 2..thats over 100 of us in 9 houses and we seen no plane...



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 06:06 PM
link   
And don't we forget that the antenna was the first thing to start a drop to the ground, meaning that the core was totally blown and there was no resistance starting in the very middle of the building and then spreading outward quickly, as the video shows.

If fire had weakened steel supports in the areas affected by the strike ( alleged ) the Tower would have tilted and fallen sideways, of course. But what do we see? The antenna drops showing the core was removed, all the way to the top of the Tower, and that the top of the building simply began turning to dust and losing all ability to provide any resistance whatsoever. resistance factor zero, from a building like that...it staggers the mind to imagine that people actually swallow the official lie.

On both Towers, we see the same exact phenomenon: At a certain moment, despite the structure appearing sound and robust, the area close to the strike zone flares up with fire and explosions and the top starts to drop, turning to dust as it does. There are bursts upward and outward, including hurling vast sections hundreds of yards, but there are not enough accompanying noises to be normal explosive. We are watching explosions that are quiet beyone the sound of the structural noise associated with the destruction.

That means one thing and one thing only: Some vast energy source was focused on those Towers and the applied energy was able to accomplish the damage seen. It was controlled and limited, although the ' beams ' swept across areas away from the Towers, resulting in the damage seen to cars and such blocks away that could not possible have been affected by the Towers directly.

In the one Tower that had the tolting section that miraculously stopped the fall to the side and dropped straight down. I bet the guy sitting at the control console directing this event was about as puckered as can be when that happened..he almost dropped the top 30 some floors of a Tower in the wrong spot!! But they managed to turn the entire area below the section into dust so that there was no resistance at all and the block of floors could drop down for easy cleanup and limited damage. That was no easy feat.

Conventional explosives in key floors were needed to pull this off: I believe that the planes, or whatever, were directed in to certain exact points on purpose so the explosives could make sure the upper floors above the strike zone were pulverized at the right time. But curious is the fact that if some beams from above were used, and not much else makes any sense, then they may have been directed from the side rather than exclusively from the top..in any case, we know that the Towers were felled intentionally by inside players from the Neocon cabal, represented in the WH by the consummate evil black heart, Dick Cheney.

No planes crashed in Penn. and Washington, and the NY planes are in doubt as well, so this was a master plan of dimensions that deserve respect..but also of course condemnation . I would love to know the planner and executor of this plan; this is one sharp cookie, to combine control of the media with control of the congress andon and on..they are in control. Thats the scary part.



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 06:50 PM
link   
reply to post by eyewitness86
 


Now you have to step back in time to the 1960s Operation Northwoods:

Key financial players the same:

Rockefeller
Morgan
Rothschild
And other major international financial families of power and wealth (World Bank and the privately owned US Federal Reserve by a few elite international financiers only part of it all)

Turning to the inside and fringes of politics 1960s:

LBJ
Dulles brothers
J. Edgar Hoover
Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr.
And others, including George H. W. Bush, who had his body into both politics and finance

Then follow the money back to the most powerful, wealthy families of international history, including the US

If you want to know who the most powerful US families are, that requires research of Skull and Bones Chapter 322, Yale University. There will be any number of familiar names when researching Skull and Bones - all the way back to the 1960s and Operation Northwoods, the Bush and Cheney families being only two generational families of Skull and Bone and Yale attendance.

www.amazon.com...



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 07:29 PM
link   
There is a video that goes into this matter, "september clues". I find it pretty interesting. I think some claims in the video were debunked, or it was said to be debunked, I think it is worth watching.

Judge for yourself:

nl.youtube.com...


That's only part one, the rest is linked on youtube.



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by IvanZana


The tower is on WTC 1, WTC 2 is what is being hit during the static tv blackout.

The planes didnt even knock out the electricity to the towers.



It was the psychic impact of what was occuring. The spiritual outcry of those in Tower 1.



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 09:06 PM
link   
reply to post by enigmania
 


Thank you. I will take a look at it. However, the book I recommended is by Antony Sutton. That book has never been debunked. It has a list of Skull and Bones members from the start through, as I recall, 1977. A Skull and Bones member became disenchanted with the fraternity and members, and handed a secret list to Antony Sutton, who printed it in his book and made it public.

By 1977 or the last date copies were given out to each pledged member receiving the lists, Skull and Bones no longer gave out those lists to any of their fraternal brothers and sisters. The original is locked in a safe, taken out to record all new members, and put back in the safe.



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 10:09 PM
link   
What's been described isn't actually a blackout but more like a temporary audio thing. It fits the reaction time of an auto audio levelling control in the camera itself with a sudden large increase in sound pressure due to jet noise, impact and explosion.

Was this only on the Sky News feed is something I'd like to know.

I think it was the CNN feed shown here that was shot from the other side of WTC2 giving a good view of the plane entering the building - I don't recall any notable interference in that one.

The lack of video interference tends to rule out electrical noise as the cause.



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by enigmania
 


I just watched the first video you recommended with your link. One shows something like a plane shape overshooting behind WTC 2, and no indication how it gets back to hit the target - WTC 2. Then another shot has it coming in at some impossible angle behind the building where no one can see what is happening. Yet, those are supposed to be live shots from Fox and used by CNN?

Would others also watch at the link and relate what they see on those videos? Thank you in advance for watching.

nl.youtube.com...



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 11:18 PM
link   
reply to post by eyewitness86
 


"Conventional explosives in key floors were needed to pull this off: I believe that the planes, or whatever, were directed in to certain exact points on purpose so the explosives could make sure the upper floors above the strike zone were pulverized at the right time. But curious is the fact that if some beams from above were used, and not much else makes any sense, then they may have been directed from the side rather than exclusively from the top..in any case, we know that the Towers were felled intentionally by inside players "

Nice point eyewitness86 I have heard from a myriad of 911 sites that the pilots were poorly skilled and my first thought was a radio beacon preset in the buildings (with the explosives) sending a signal if not instructions to the planes (or whatever) guidence systems to get them on target.
Have you seen any info on this aspect, its makes logical sense and would seem to me a technicaly easy...



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 11:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quazga
It was the psychic impact of what was occuring. The spiritual outcry of those in Tower 1.

Very interesting! They would have certainly released an enormous amount of energy, maybe it affected radio waves?



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 12:28 AM
link   
reply to post by aussiespeeder
But how much skill did those pilots really need?

They didn't need to take off, land or fly by instruments at night or in bad weather. They only had to hit the biggest buildings in NYC on a clear calm morning and UA175 almost missed its target except for a last second extreme banked correction.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 01:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Pilgrum
 


Never flown any real planes have you, parrticularly commercial jetliners? If you had, you would not be making the comments you are, and neither would others.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 03:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Pilgrum
What's been described isn't actually a blackout but more like a temporary audio thing. It fits the reaction time of an auto audio levelling control in the camera itself with a sudden large increase in sound pressure due to jet noise, impact and explosion.


This would happen when the sounds reach the camera and not the instant the plane hits the building. I also fail to understand why this would cut out video feed, if you're even talking about the same thing anymore. How many explanations for this single event have you offered in this thread already?

There's an organization called "Pilots for 9/11 Truth" and they have at least two flight instructors with them that actually tried to recreate the attacks the day after they happened, and quickly realized how incredibly difficult it would have been, and they give their testimony in good detail on their site if you're interested. At the speeds given, 500-600 mph, in a jumbo jet, without navigation, it apparently isn't very easy to hit a 200-foot wide building. If you miss, it's not like you can just turn around at 500 mph. If you're a little off on the approach, you're screwed too. You have to be accurate from a respectable distance away, and long angles of the flight approaches show very slight angles in their approaches. It would be much easier to remotely control them and just program the entire routes.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 04:10 AM
link   
reply to post by bsbray11
Apparently the 'blackout' isn't a blackout at all but just interference in the audio at the moment of the impact. Sound in NYC travels at 1100'/sec so auto volume levelling is a *possible* cause for it.

Those vaguaries of high-speed flight you mention are actually something that leads me away from the idea of pre-planted charges in the buildings apart from the fact that no-one has real evidence of anything exploding (enough to demolish such a building that is).

Imagine the buildings meticulously pre-rigged for a plane to impact on the 80th floor and due to an unexpected updraft/downdraft or whatever the plane misses the target by several floors or even altogether misses the building and hits the wrong one IE not a WTC building. Would it be back to the drawing board or give it another shot tomorrow or do 'they' just press the button and pretend it was an earthquake?

The same difficulties apply to remote controlled flight but that concept is one that fits for me (remote control) & can't be ruled out.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 04:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by Pilgrum
 


Never flown any real planes have you, parrticularly commercial jetliners?


But you have?



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 04:53 AM
link   
Another possibility for the audio silencing could be that the photographer uttered several expletives that required muting out - I know I would have.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 08:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Pilgrum
 


Yeah that pilots for 911 site says it well.
I have tried it on a flightsim but I am no pilot (unless its a fighter!) lol!

I know there are some planes that can land themselves (airbus for one ) using radar guidence I think it might be a simple download of a flightplan or remote control to a target beacon.
Any pilots here or military dudes that use that type of stuff?



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 09:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Pilgrum
Another possibility for the audio silencing could be that the photographer uttered several expletives that required muting out - I know I would have.



It would seem that some RF Jammer was used.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 11:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Pilgrum
 


What would that have to do with no one seeing any planes actually impacting? Impact will normally be seen before explosion. Explosion prior to impact is putting the cart before the horse. That is impossible in the world of physical reality. If there is an explosion, there will be no pentration of a double steel wall building. It will never happen.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join