posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 11:33 AM
reply to post by IvanZana
I did not hear the higher frequency of any dishes rattling, and am not saying no one else can hear it. The initial explosion is the top length and
width core support half sliding of the bottom, and explosively hitting the concrete floors, immediately below where the supports were cutter charge
It was done in rapid succession. When enough supports are cut at the width and length of one side, there will be a delay in the other side dropping
until those are also completely symmetrically cut. The top leans one way when one half is cut, and then shifts back the other as the other side, if
completely lenght and width symmetrically cut. That is normal when pulling buildings using implosion, and dropping buildings straight down into their
own footprints. It creates a much larger initial velocity force momentum, as long as the top does not topple, rather than shifting back were it
My concentration for 6 years was WTC. IMHO, I knew if that could be resolved, the rest of the details of two other locations would easily be resolved
as well. WTC is the key to knowing what happened on 9/11/2001. I had to seriously study the science of controlled demolition implosion with articles
from experts and many video observations of legal controlled demolitions. I learned they do not always bring down buildings the same way. It depends
on where the buildings are located - congested urban, less congested suburban, or rural.
They do not have to drop buildings the same way as WTC 1 and 2. WTC 7 is proof of that. Yet, they all ended being pulled with implosive force and
gravity into their own footprints.