Originally posted by mikesingh

And that's what happens if you don't copyright your images!

[edit on 12-1-2008 by mikesingh]

Interesting find. They do look like faces, but they will probably just turn out like the other famous face on mars.

You're not really copyrighting those images, btw.

Did you know that your work is automatically copyrighted the moment you create it? You don't even have to add your name to the picture.

You are merely adding your non-legally binding screen name to the picture - which could be edited off - resulting in someones work, which would automatically give them copyright as long as you did nothing about it, legally . If you actually wanted to do anything about that, say a lawsuit to protect your pictures, you'd have to register those pictures with a government copyright office.

Otherwise, I'd say what you are doing is operating on an honor system and declaring more of an "internet reputationright" than anything else .

You're images - like pirated music - are only copyrighted as much as you are willing to take legal action.

Originally posted by benign.psychosis
Did you know that your work is automatically copyrighted the moment you create it? You don't even have to add your name to the picture.

Thanks BP, but I didn't know that it's automatic!! Why I've started doing this is because I know how it feels getting ripped off by someone and claiming the find and all the work done on the images as his!

Cheers!

a foundation course in formal logic really would help avoiding such basic errrors as :

Originally posted by mikesinghImagination? Rock formations? Whatever, these except the last one, resemble the ‘face’ on Cydonia. If the latter has positively been debunked and proved beyond doubt that it’s just a natural rock formation, then these can be considered natural geological formations too.

But as far as I know, the jury is still out on that one!!

please address each formation / alledged geoglyph as a single unique entity . and investigate the evidence of its alledged artificiality independantly

the nature and origin of one formation has ZERO bearing on the nature / origin of the others

is this simple , logical approach to investigation too much to ask ?

PS - as i am pleading for scientific rigour in thiese ` investigations ` can we have a scale for these images ??

Always a pleasure to read your threads mike. I find it interesting that you always remain ambivalent about the nature of these artifacts, a good stance, since how can any one man truly be sure of anything? But I think we both know enough about the subject to come to the conclusion that many of these artifacts are indeed, evidence of sentience.

The rhythm of light stays bright in the midst of the night.

Those are just rocks people...


Rocks.... plain and simple....

[edit on 13-1-2008 by omnicron]

Originally posted by omnicron
Those are just rocks people...


Rocks.... plain and simple....

[edit on 13-1-2008 by omnicron]

Your surety of what they are not is surely as foolish as that of the man who is sure of what they are.

You are my opponent.

there are things much deeper than what you may see speechless.

Good find! Keep us updated if you find anything else

Originally posted by Arawn
I'd be interested if people found face images through rock formations here on Earth, just for comparison. From satellite images. If none could be found here on Earth, I'd be more of a believer that potentially 'races' created them on Mars.

I wouldn't. The environment on mars is so much different than Earth. There appears to be a novel ratio of rock formations to sand. The sand is constantly shaping the landscape as it moves quicky across the surface. What we are seeing is akin to the deltas which are formed at the mouths of rivers. Thats why they all have that triangular like apperance ( two supposed eyes, and one supposed chin or mouth).

Originally posted by merka
I'm finding the formation north in the image much more interesting. Why isnt it a ridge like all the other formations in the area?

That's right merka. Those gold colored formations at the top of the source image are pretty striking. I haven't brought this up as it doesn't concern the 'faces', but probably requires to be discussed in a separate thread!

Cheers!

" our intrepid little internet nerd "

Sorry mike but....

I truly appreciate what you're doing though...keep up the outstanding
work

Anyway I was thinking…..you should literally post these 3 faces to Richard C. Hoagland …I’m sure he’d be interested….hell, you might even get some time on
coast-to-coast…..




[edit on 13-1-2008 by andre18]

Originally posted by andre18
Anyway I was thinking…..you should literally post these 3 faces to Richard C. Hoagland …I’m sure he’d be interested….hell, you might even get some time on
coast-to-coast…..

Bah! I don't need any publicity! If RCH or anyone else is interested, they can enter the portals of ATS and get the needed gen!

Thanks andre!

Cheers!

[edit on 14-1-2008 by mikesingh]