us planes unleash 40,000 pounds of bombs, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:04 PM by deltaboy
reply to post by gunner36



People thought we were staying in Saudi Arabia forever till oil is all gone. We pulled out after the Iraq threat was gone. So don't think I'm crazy about such thoughts. Don't believe in Al Qaeda propaganda about American troops staying forever on holy lands of Mecca and Medina. Of course its going to piss people off when invading other countries. Similar to Japanese Kamikaze pilots that don't want American troops on Japanese soil. These are to be expected in war. Right now in Afghanistan we have about 30,000 plus troops fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban and it pisses them off. Of course its pisses them off, but 9/11 pisses us off, so we do what we do best in wars. Take the fight to the enemy.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:06 PM by deltaboy
reply to post by Wolfie_UK



Hey it wasn't our fault that Iraq used WMDs back in the 80s and harass UN inspectors for many years. Remember Desert Fox by President Bill Clinton. Even he thought Iraq was considered a threat. Bush is no different.



reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:07 PM by Wolfie_UK
reply to post by deltaboy



Wasn't it America who decided to dream up WMD's and therefore make Iraq it's enemy and not that Iraq forced itself onto America as an enemy.

TBH I'm amazed you guys managed to find Iraq for the second Gulf war and not end up in a totally different country, knowing that Geography is not your greatest attribute.

I suppose if the boot was on the other foot and the story was about bombs dropping on Washington via the Iraqi airforce you wouldn't mind any Iraqi ATS members standing up for the justification of it..............no thought not


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:16 PM by marg6043
reply to post by musselwhite



You now that the first link with the story is not working right now, the second link doesn't mention Al-qaida civilians.

Anyway, it seems that the people including the Anti American insurgency will be pounded with bombs until they submit or die.

Al-qaida my butt.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:17 PM by Harlequin
reply to post by deltaboy



but you might get an allergic reaction to the feathers....

seriously this entire oil grab ; erm `war on terror` yeah thats it , really should be costing all the lives if there was a better foreign policy - the entire thing with Iran is because they threw out the puppet in 1979.


offensive defence - do it to them before they do it to you


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:19 PM by Harlequin
reply to post by deltaboy



btw the US used WMD`s in fullajah so whats the diffence now


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:27 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Harlequin



The difference is that when US does it is ok and is all for the good of the nation been devastated, when another nation does it, they are evil and causing genocide.

And you better do not say anything derogatory either because that will make you anti patriotic, America hater and terrorist friendly.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:30 PM by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to
post by deltaboy



btw the US used WMD`s in fullajah so whats the diffence now


What are you talking about?
Care to provide some sort of evidence for this outlandish claim.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:31 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Extralien



Are you kidding? the bush administration is bringing prosperity and wealth to the nation of Iraq and to all the Iraqis, I forgot just the ones that will survived after this administration finish with the insurgency and terrorist, they all Al-qaida BTW.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:37 PM by Harlequin
reply to post by 4thDoctorWhoFan



white phosphorus is a WMD in 99% of the countries in teh world - except the USA.

so `outlandish` it is not.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:39 PM by marg6043
reply to post by 4thDoctorWhoFan



What do you call 40,000 pound bombs in Iraq along with all the weapons been used in that nation since ithe nvasion by the Bush administration.

Firecrackers?


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:44 PM by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to
post by 4thDoctorWhoFan



What do you call 40,000 pound bombs in Iraq along with all the weapons been used in that nation since ithe nvasion by the Bush administration.

Firecrackers?



Umm....its certainly not WMD.
Come on, you know this.


reply posted on 10-1-2008 @ 04:47 PM by deltaboy
reply to post by Harlequin



O really? Lets see the official word by the UN on the usage of WP. I dare ya.

It would be in the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^